Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35949885›Full record

ArticleResearch and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis2022

Thromboprophylaxis for children hospitalized with COVID-19 and MIS-C.

Anna H Schmitz, Kelly E Wood, Elliot L Burghardt, Bryan P Koestner, Linder H Wendt, Aditya V Badheka, Anjali A Sharathkumar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. MIS-C: Diagnosis, Management, and Outcomes.Open forum infectious diseases · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Thromboprophylaxis for children hospitalized with COVID-19 and MIS-C.Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Anna H SchmitzStead Family Department of Pediatrics University of Iowa Iowa City Iowa USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6631-1069
Kelly E WoodStead Family Department of Pediatrics University of Iowa Iowa City Iowa USA.
Elliot L BurghardtCarver College of Medicine University of Iowa Iowa City Iowa USA.
Bryan P KoestnerStead Family Department of Pediatrics University of Iowa Iowa City Iowa USA.
Linder H WendtInstitute for Clinical and Translational Science University of Iowa Iowa City Iowa USA.
Aditya V BadhekaStead Family Department of Pediatrics University of Iowa Iowa City Iowa USA.
Anjali A SharathkumarStead Family Department of Pediatrics University of Iowa Iowa City Iowa USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4574-6175

Funding

The University of Iowa Clinical and Translational Science AwardUL1TR002537 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI HANSEN, MARLAN R, WINOKUR, PATRICIA · 2018 to 2022
$20.0M
Medical Scientist Training ProgramT32GM139776 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI Gordon F Buchanan · 2021 to 2026
$6.4M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002537NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM139776
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Limited data exist about effective regimens for pharmacological thromboprophylaxis in children with acute coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C). Objectives: Study the outcomes of institutional thromboprophylaxis protocol for primary venous thromboembolism (VTE) prevention in children hospitalized with acute COVID-19/MIS-C. Methods: This single-center retrospective cohort study included consecutive children (aged less than 21 years) with COVID-19/MIS-C who received tailored intensity thromboprophylaxis, primarily with low-molecular-weight heparin, from April 2020 through October 2021. Thromboprophylaxis was given to those with moderate to severe disease based on the World Health Organization scale and exposure to two or more VTE risk factors. Therapeutic intensity was considered for severe illness. Clinical recovery along with D-dimer improvement determined thromboprophylaxis duration. Outcomes were incident VTEs, bleeding, and mortality. Results: Among 211 hospitalizations, 45 (21.3%) received thromboprophylaxis (COVID-19, 16; MIS-C, 29). Median age was 14.8 years (interquartile range [IQR], 8.9-16.1). Among 35 (77.8%) with severe illness, 27 (60.0%) required respiratory support, and 19 (42.2%) required an intensive care unit stay. Median hospitalization was 6 days (IQR, 5.0-10.5). Median thromboprophylaxis duration was 19 days (IQR, 6.0-31.0) with therapeutic intensity in 24 (53.3%) and prophylactic in 21 (46.7%). Outcomes were as follows: VTE, 1 (2.2%); death, 1 (2.2%, unrelated to bleeding/thrombosis); major/clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding, 0; and minor bleeding, 7 (15.5%). D-dimer was elevated in a majority at diagnosis (median, 2.3; IQR, 1.2-3.3 mg/ml fibrinogen-equivalent units) and was noninformative in assessing disease severity. D-dimer normalized at thromboprophylaxis discontinuation. Conclusions: Our experience of using clinically directed thromboprophylaxis with tailored intensity approach for children hospitalized with COVID-19 and MIS-C favors its inclusion in current standard of care. The role of D-dimer in directing thromboprophylaxis management deserves further evaluation.

Indexed as

anticoagulantschildCOVID‐19heparinlow molecular weightMIS‐Cthrombosisvenous thromboembolism

Identifiers

PMID35949885
PMCPMC9357887

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.