ArticleCureus2022
Urticaria in a Pediatric Population: A Portuguese Single-Center Cohort Report.
Article in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Urticaria typically involves the skin and mucosa and is characterized by the development of wheals, angioedema, or both. According to the temporal evolution of the lesions, urticaria is classified as acute (AU) or chronic (CU), depending on whether the episodes last for fewer or more than six weeks, respectively. This study aimed to characterize a group of children and adolescents with urticaria and describe its subtypes, associated comorbidities, treatment, and evolution. Methodology This retrospective, observational study included patients aged <18 years who were diagnosed with urticaria in a tertiary teaching hospital in Portugal, and followed up in a Pediatric Allergy Unit, between January 2019 and December 2021. Results A total of 43 patients, aged nine months to 16 years were included. Of these, 22 (51%) were males. AU was identified in 12 (28%) cases, chronic spontaneous urticaria in 21 (63%), and physical urticaria (to cold) in four (9%). Autoantibodies were detected in four patients with spontaneous urticaria. In 6% of patients with CU, the episodes were associated with angioedema. Most CU episodes were successfully managed with the recommended or double the recommended dose (48%) of H1 antihistamines. Three patients requiring fourfold higher than the recommended dose of H1 antihistamines remained unresponsive and were started on omalizumab. Associated autoimmune thyroiditis was diagnosed in four patients. Conclusions In this cohort of patients, urticaria was equally distributed between the genders and the first-line therapy was second-generation antihistamines, consistent with current guidelines. Universal screening for autoimmune diseases in patients with chronic spontaneous urticaria revealed four cases of thyroiditis, which supports the relevance of this approach when managing CU.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.