Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35949699›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of health sciences

Magnetic resonance imaging and intractable epilepsy: A systematic review.

Fahad Alshehri

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of health sciences. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 51% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Fahad AlshehriDepartment of Radiology, College of Medicine, Qassim University, Buraydah, Saudi Arabia.
Qassim University · SA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Epilepsy is a chronic neurological disorder that occurs due to irregular neuronal activity in the central nervous system. The main job of a radiologist is to investigate the structural etiology in epilepsy patients. This study was undertaken to find out the importance of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the screening of intractable epilepsy through a systematic search of literature. Methods: A systematic review was performed using the PRISMA guidelines. Peer-reviewed studies on MRI and intractable epilepsy were retrieved from MEDLINE, ScienceDirect and Google Scholar. Moreover, studies cited in the key articles were also screened to increase the sensitivity and specificity of the systematic search. Results: The database search till March 2022 found a total of 112610 articles. Out of them, only 10 highly selected articles were included in the study. The pooled data point out that the rapid development in MRI techniques and the functional MRI (fMRI) has now become more and more critical in the diagnosis and management of patients with epilepsy. In addition, the data also pointed out that MRI-based approaches are also very useful for post-operative epilepsy patients as it gives information about the quality of the surgery. The data collected showed that the MRI is the choice technique for the evaluation of patients with epilepsy. Conclusions: The applicability of MRI in epilepsy diagnosis is highly accessible in all over the globe. The pooled data concluded that the MRI-based surgical approaches are extremely useful for the surgeons to provide three-dimensional imaging with superimposed real-time pointer details that have proved successful for epilepsy patients.

Indexed as

functional MRIintractable epilepsyMRIsystematic review

Identifiers

PMID35949699
PMCPMC9288133
OpenAlexW4290974136

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.