ArticleHepatology forum2020
Prevalence and characteristics of bone disease in cirrhotic patients.
Article in Hepatology forum, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Aim: Chronic liver disease is a risk factor for osteoporosis, osteopenia and bone fractures. In this study, prevalence and risk factors of osteoporosis and vitamin D deficiency and also their effects on survival were investigated in 218 patients with chronic liver disease. Materials and Methods: Prevalence of osteoporosis and vitamin D levels was calculated. Risk factors for osteoporosis (gender, age, body mass index, etiology), serum bilirubin, albumin, 25-hydroxy (OH) vitamin D, parathyroid hormone levels, bone mineral density (BMD) with DEXA, bone formation (osteocalcin) and bone resorption (type 1 collagen) levels, Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) Na and Child-Pugh (CP) score were recorded. The effects of vitamin D levels and BMD on survival were evaluated. Results: One hundred forty-seven (67.4%) patients were female (mean age, 50.4±11.7). Patients were Child A by 40.8%, Child B by 47.1%, and Child C by 12.1%. Mean MELD Na score was 8.4±2.8. Data of the BMD were established in 218 patients and 25-OH D levels in 122 patients. Mean serum 25-OH D level was 14.26±9.44 ng/mL. Osteoporosis was identified in 42 (19.3%) and osteopenia in 115 (52.8%) patients, according to BMD. Osteocalcin levels and collagen type 1 levels were high in 25.6% and 12.5% of patients, respectively. No statistically difference was found, including gender (p=0.69), age (p=0.38), etiology (p=0.16), BMI (p=0.32), CP score (p=0.42), MELD (0.14), albumin (p=0.11), total bilirubin (p=0.99), Ca (0.67), PTH (0.88), osteocalcin (0.92), collagen type 1(p=0.25) between osteoporotic and non-osteoporotic patients. Patients were followed-up for a median of 30.07±11.83 months after BMD measurement. Fifty-four (24.8%) patients died during the follow-up period, none of them are related to bone fracture. There was no statistically difference on survival between osteoporosis group (32.2±2.3 months) and non-osteoporosis group (37.2±1.7 months; p=0.26) or when patients with 25-OH D Conclusion: In conclusion, the prevalence of bone disease was found to be higher in cirrhotic patients. Although osteoporosis and vitamin D deficiency were found to decrease survival, this effect was not statistically significant. We suggest designing multi-institutional and/or multinational studies with larger and more heterogenous patient groups would enable better testing of this phenomenon.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.