Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35949374›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of sports physical therapy2022

Normative Reference Values and Validity for the 30-Second Chair-Stand Test in Healthy Young Adults.

Donald H Lein, Mansour Alotaibi, Marzouq Almutairi, Harshvardhan Singh

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of sports physical therapy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 44 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
13.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07253935 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Efficacy of a Combined Approach of Therapeutic Exercise, Psychotherapy, and Therapeutic Education in Patients With Depression: The ACTIDEP Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorMarcoMateoRieraRan2025 to 2027Enrolled112ConditionsDepression DisorderArmsPsychotherapy, Graded activity combined with exercise and education
NCT07676591 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2027, after this paper: background citation

EmpowerHer: Protocol for a Multicentre Randomized Controlled Trial Evaluating a Hybrid Digital Exercise and Education Intervention for Breast Cancer Survivors Across Five European Countries

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of ValenciaRan2027 to 2028Enrolled147ConditionsBreast Cancer, Cancer Survivors, Quality of Life, Exercise TherapyArmsEmpowerHer Hybrid Program
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Delivering prehabilitation in cancer surgery: a service evaluation at Nottingham University Hospitals.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Donald H LeinPhysical Therapy, University of Alabama at Birmingham.
Mansour AlotaibiDepartment of Physical Therapy, University of Alabama at Birmingham; Faculty of Applied Health Science, Northern Border University.
Marzouq AlmutairiDepartment of Physical Therapy, The University of Alabama at Birmingham; Department of Physical Therapy, College of Medical Rehabilitation Qassim University.
Harshvardhan SinghPhysical Therapy, University of Alabama at Birmingham.
University of Alabama at Birmingham · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Clinicians often use physical performance tests (PPT) to measure performance measures in sports since they are easy to administer, portable, and cost-efficient. However, PPT often lack good or known psychometric properties. Perhaps, the 30-second chair-stand test (30CST) would be a good functional test in athletic populations as it has been shown to demonstrate good psychometric properties in older adults. Hypothesis/Purpose: The purpose of this study was to determine normative values for and concurrent, convergent and discriminative validity of 30CST for healthy young adults aged 19-35 years. Study Design: Cross-sectional. Methods: Eighty-one participants completed this study. All participants performed two trials of 30CST, 5-times sit-to-stand (5xSTS), and lateral step-up test (LSUT). Investigators used the International Physical Activity Questionnaire Leisure Domain (LD-IPAQ) to divide participants into insufficiently or sufficiently active groups based on the weekly metabolic equivalent of task per the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans. Results: Participants (Mean + SD age, 25.1 ± 3.4 years; body height, 1.71 ± 0.09 m; body mass, 72.6 ± 16.1 kg; females 47) performed an average of 33.0±5.4 30CST repetitions. The 30CST performance was negatively associated with 5xSTS ( Conclusions: In addition to finding a reference value for 30CST performance in young adults, investigators found that the 30CST displayed concurrent and convergent validity in assessing functional lower extremity (LE) muscle strength and discriminated between those with sufficient and insufficient physical activity levels. Training and rehabilitation professionals could use the 30CST for testing functional LE muscle strength for athletes in pre-season or during rehabilitation. Future investigators should perform studies to determine if 30CST predicts sport performance. Level of Evidence: Level 2.

Indexed as

Normal ValuesPhysical Performance TestsPsychometric TestingSit-to-Stand Tests

Identifiers

PMID35949374
PMCPMC9340829
OpenAlexW4291021470

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.