ArticleExperimental and therapeutic medicine2022
Tiotropium as an add-on treatment to inhaled corticosteroids in children with severe and mild symptomatic asthma: Multi-center observational study for efficacy and safety analysis.
Article in Experimental and therapeutic medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Saudi initiative for asthma - 2024 update: Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of asthma in adults and children.Annals of thoracic medicineArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Children aged 6-11 years with uncontrolled asthma are treated with low-dose inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) with stepwise increase in ICS dosage and/or add-on maintenance treatment, as necessary. The objective of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of tiotropium add-on treatment in children with severe and mild symptomatic asthma. The present prospective cohort study included 144 children with severe and mild asthma (age, 6-11 years) who received ICS (budesonide) with ≥1 controller treatment combination therapies for ≥1 month and score ≥1.5 based on Asthma Control Questionnaire-Interviewer-Administered. In addition to ICS with ≥1 controller treatment, children received 5 µg once-daily tiotropium (treatment group; n=72) or did not receive tiotropium (control group; n=72). The peak forced expiratory volume in 1-sec change from the baseline 3 h post-administration of tiotropium was significantly improved in the treatment group compared with the control group (384±31 vs. 248±28 ml; P<0.0001). The trough forced expiratory volume in 1-sec (224±28 vs. 140±31 ml; P<0.0001) and forced expiratory flow at 25-75% of forced vital capacity (389±36 vs. 116±27 ml/sec; P<0.0001) showed significant improvement following treatment with tiotropium. Significant differences were noted for trough forced vital capacity (153±29 vs. 139±30 ml/sec; P<0.0001), mean weekly rescue treatment usage (0.29±0.08 vs. 0.36±0.09; P<0.0001), mean weekly peak expiratory flow measurement (4.12±3.56 vs. 7.46±3.29 l/min; P<0.0001) and mean weekly symptom-free time (0.19±0.04 vs. 0.16±0.04 days; P<0.0001) between both cohorts. Children of both groups tolerated any adverse effects. Tiotropium 5 µg administered once/day as an add-on treatment to ICS with ≥1 controller treatments in children (6-11 years of age) with severe and mild symptomatic asthma was found to be efficacious and safe (level of evidence 2; technical efficacy stage 4).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.