Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35949321›Full record

ArticleExperimental and therapeutic medicine2022

Comparison of a histone deacetylase inhibitor plus exemestane with exemestane alone in hormone receptor-positive advanced breast cancer that progressed on prior endocrine therapy: A meta-analysis.

Liang Xu, Weifan Jiang, Wenwei Li, Chungen Guo, Lihua Luo, Yufeng Gao, Yali Cao

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental and therapeutic medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Liang XuPrevention and Cure Center of Breast Disease, The Third Hospital of Nanchang City, Nanchang, Jiangxi 330009, P.R. China.
Weifan JiangDepartment of Urinary Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Nanchang University School of Medicine, Nanchang, Jiangxi 330006, P.R. China.
Wenwei LiPrevention and Cure Center of Breast Disease, The Third Hospital of Nanchang City, Nanchang, Jiangxi 330009, P.R. China.
Chungen GuoPrevention and Cure Center of Breast Disease, The Third Hospital of Nanchang City, Nanchang, Jiangxi 330009, P.R. China.
Lihua LuoPrevention and Cure Center of Breast Disease, The Third Hospital of Nanchang City, Nanchang, Jiangxi 330009, P.R. China.
Yufeng GaoMedical Department, Graduate School of Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi 330006, P.R. China.
Yali CaoPrevention and Cure Center of Breast Disease, The Third Hospital of Nanchang City, Nanchang, Jiangxi 330009, P.R. China.
Third Hospital of Nanchang · CNNanchang University · CNSecond Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Currently, endocrine therapy is the standard treatment for hormone receptor-positive advanced breast cancer (ABC). Despite the high sensitivity of anti-estrogen therapy, many breast cancer patients still experience disease progression, relapse, and reduced overall survival (OS) because of endocrine resistance. Several underlying mechanisms of this phenomenon include a change in hormone receptor expression, mutations in ESR1 and modification of important signaling pathways, but thus far none of these can be defined as the complete explanation. Additionally, it has been shown that in some breast cancers, expression of the estrogen receptor (ER) can be repressed by epigenetic modifications such as DNA methylation and histone deacetylation, and this could be a mechanism for endocrine resistance. Interestingly, although the efficacy of the combination of histone deacetylase (HADC) inhibitors and exemestane in hormone receptor-positive ABC that progressed on prior endocrine therapy has been investigated in several studies, whether pharmacologic blocking of HDAC activity acts as a therapeutic strategy remains highly controversial. Herein, we conducted a meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of an HDAC inhibitor plus exemestane vs. exemestane alone in this setting. Our meta-analysis demonstrated that the combination group exhibited significantly prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) [hazard ratio (HR)=0.776, 95% confidence interval (CI)=0.675-0.892, P=0.000] and an improved objective response rate (ORR) (RR=1.612, 95% CI=1.085-2.396, P=0.018) compared to those treated with exemestane alone. Additionally, in terms of OS, the combination group failed to achieve a significant clinical OS benefit (HR=0.811, 95% CI=0.596-1.104, P=0.183). Although grade 3/4 toxicities were more common in the combination group, those toxicities were mostly asymptomatic and manageable. In conclusion, the addition of an HDAC inhibitor to exemestane significantly improves PFS over exemestane alone in hormone receptor-positive ABC patients who progressed on previous endocrine therapy. Identification of novel biomarkers to select patients who will benefit from this combination strategy is a high priority.

Indexed as

breast cancercombination therapyendocrine resistancehistone deacetylase inhibitorsmetastasis

Identifiers

PMID35949321
PMCPMC9353490
OpenAlexW4285729559

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.