ArticleLiver cancer2022
Surgery versus Radiofrequency Ablation for Small Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Randomized Controlled Trial (SURF Trial).
Article in Liver cancer, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 114 papers, 10 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
114 citing papers in PubMed, 10 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 182 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparison of surgical resection and radiofrequency ablation for the treatment of small hepatocellular carcinoma (≤ 3 cm): an updated meta-analysis.Systematic reviews · 2026Pooled it
- Liver resection versus radiofrequency ablation for solitary small hepatocellular carcinoma measuring ≤3 cm: a systematic review and meta-analysis.International journal of surgery (London, England) · 2025Pooled it
- Liver resection versus radiofrequency ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma: A systemic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Pooled it
- Locoregional Therapies for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.JAMA network open · 2024Pooled it
- Laparoscopic liver resection is superior to radiofrequency ablation for small hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis of propensity score-matched studies.Hepatology international · 2024Pooled it
- Therapeutic Effects of Natural Products on Liver Cancer and Their Potential Mechanisms.Nutrients · 2024Pooled it
- Comparison of liver resection and radiofrequency ablation in long-term survival among patients with early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma: a meta-analysis of randomized trials and high-quality propensity score-matched studies.World journal of surgical oncology · 2024Pooled it
- Radiofrequency Ablation versus Surgical Resection in Elderly Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2024Pooled it
- Application value of different imaging methods in the early diagnosis of small hepatocellular carcinoma: a network meta-analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Pooled it
- Clinical practice guidelines and real-life practice in hepatocellular carcinoma: A Japanese perspective.Clinical and molecular hepatology · 2023Guideline
- Partial hepatectomy versus interventional treatment in patients with hepatitis B virus-related hepatocellular carcinoma and clinically significant portal hypertension: a randomized comparative clinical trial.Cancer communications (London, England) · 2024Trial
- Clinical impact of salvage hepatectomy for local recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma after radiofrequency ablation or selective transarterial chemoembolization.International journal of clinical oncology · 2026Article
- AI-driven ablative margin assessment after HCC radiofrequency ablation: a case-control feasibility study.European radiology experimental · 2026Article
- Review
- Factors Affecting Temporal Changes in Ablated Liver Volume After Radiofrequency Ablation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Evaluated by Three-Dimensional Volumetric Computed Tomography.Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.) · 2026Article
- Laparoscopic or Open Liver Resection Versus Multibipolar Radiofrequency Ablation of HCC Within Milan Criteria on Cirrhosis.Liver international : official journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver · 2026Article
- Cirrhosis, portal hypertension and hepatocellular carcinoma: a stage-based approach.Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2026Review
- Review
- Progression of Atrioventricular Conduction Disorder Induced by Radiofrequency Ablation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma.Cureus · 2026Article
- Article
54 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors at 13 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: It remains unclear which surgery or radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is the more effective treatment for small hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). We aimed to compare survival between patients undergoing surgery (surgery group) and patients undergoing RFA (RFA group). Methods: We conducted a randomized controlled trial involving 49 institutions in Japan. Patients with Child-Pugh scores ≤7, largest HCC diameter ≤3 cm, and ≤3 HCC nodules were considered eligible. The co-primary endpoints were recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS). The current study reports the final result of RFS, and the follow-up of OS is still ongoing. Results: During 2009-2015, 308 patients were registered. After excluding ineligible patients, the surgery and RFA groups included 150 and 151 patients, respectively. Baseline factors did not differ significantly between the groups. In both groups, 90% of patients had solitary HCC. The median largest HCC diameter was 1.8 cm (interquartile range [IQR], 1.5-2.2 cm) in the surgery group and 1.8 cm (IQR, 1.5-2.3 cm) in the RFA group. The median procedure duration (274 vs. 40 min, Discussion/Conclusion: Our study did not show which surgery or RFA is the better treatment option for small HCC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.