Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35949294›Full record

ArticleLiver cancer2022

A Hybrid Machine Learning Model Based on Semantic Information Can Optimize Treatment Decision for Naïve Single 3-5-cm HCC Patients.

Wenzhen Ding, Zhen Wang, Fang-Yi Liu, Zhi-Gang Cheng, Xiaoling Yu, Zhiyu Han, Hui Zhong, Jie Yu, Ping Liang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Liver cancer, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. [Establishment of a database for liver cancer ablation and its clinical research value].Zhonghua gan zang bing za zhi = Zhonghua ganzangbing zazhi = Chinese journal of hepatology · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Wenzhen DingDepartment of Interventional Ultrasound, The First Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Zhen WangDepartment of Interventional Ultrasound, The First Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Fang-Yi LiuDepartment of Interventional Ultrasound, The First Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Zhi-Gang ChengDepartment of Interventional Ultrasound, The First Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Xiaoling YuDepartment of Interventional Ultrasound, The First Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Zhiyu HanDepartment of Interventional Ultrasound, The First Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Hui ZhongDepartment of Interventional Ultrasound, The First Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Jie YuDepartment of Interventional Ultrasound, The First Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Ping LiangDepartment of Interventional Ultrasound, The First Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Tumor recurrence is an abomination for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients receiving local treatment. Purpose: The aim of the study was to build a hybrid machine learning model to recommend optimized first treatment (laparoscopic hepatectomy [LH] or microwave ablation [MWA]) for naïve single 3-5-cm HCC patients based on early recurrence (ER, ≤2 years) probability. Methods: This retrospective study collected 20 semantic variables of 582 patients (LH: 300, MWA: 282) from 13 hospitals with at least 24 months follow-up. Both groups were divided into training, validation, and test set, respectively. Five algorithms (logistics regression, random forest, neural network, stochastic gradient boosting, and eXtreme Gradient Boosting [XGB]) were used for model building. A model with highest area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) in a validation set of LH and MWA was selected to connect as a hybrid model which made decision based on ER probability. Model testing was performed in a comprehensive set comprising LH and MWA test sets. Results: Four variables in each group were selected to build LH and MWA models, respectively. LH-XGB model (AUC = 0.744) and MWA-stochastic gradient method (AUC = 0.750) model were selected for model building. In the comprehensive set, a treatment confusion matrix was established based on recommended and actual treatment. The predicted ER probabilities were comparable with the actual ER rates for various types of patients in matrix ( Conclusions: The hybrid model can accurately predict ER probability of different treatments and thereby provide reliable evidence to make optimal treatment decision for patients with single 3-5-cm HCC.

Indexed as

Hepatocellular carcinomaLaparoscopic hepatectomyMicrowave ablationTreatment decision

Identifiers

PMID35949294
PMCPMC9218628

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.