Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35949288›Full record

ArticleLiver cancer2022

Real-World Data for Lenvatinib in Hepatocellular Carcinoma (ELEVATOR): A Retrospective Multicenter Study.

Sabrina Welland, Catherine Leyh, Fabian Finkelmeier, André Jefremow, Kateryna Shmanko, Maria A Gonzalez-Carmona, Arne Kandulski, Petia Jeliazkova, Jan Best, Thorben W Fründt and 19 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Liver cancer, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Real-world management and outcomes of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma treated with systemic therapy in Spain: a patient cohort from the RETUD gastrointestinal registry.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Navigating second-line therapy after immunotherapy in advanced HCC☆.JHEP reports : innovation in hepatology · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

29 authors at 15 institutions in 2 countries.

Sabrina WellandDepartment of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Endocrinology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Catherine LeyhDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital and University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
Fabian FinkelmeierDepartment of Internal Medicine 1, Goethe-University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany.
André JefremowDepartment of Internal Medicine 1, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany.
Kateryna ShmankoDepartment of Medicine I, University Medical Center Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany.
Maria A Gonzalez-CarmonaDepartment of Internal Medicine 1, University Hospital of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Arne KandulskiDepartment of Internal Medicine I, Regensburg University Hospital, Regensburg, Germany.
Petia JeliazkovaInternal Medicine II, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Jan BestDepartment of Internal Medicine, University Hospital Knappschaftskrankenhaus, Ruhr-University Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
Thorben W FründtDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Center, Hamburg, Germany.
Angela DjananiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Endocrinology, University Hospital of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Maria PangerlDepartment of Internal Medicine I, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein (UKSH), Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany.
Andreas MaieronInternal Medicine 2, Gastroenterology and Hepatology and Rheumatology, Karl Landsteiner University of Health Sciences, University Hospital of St. Pölten, St. Pölten, Austria.
Richard GreilSalzburg Cancer Research Institute, Department of Internal Medicine III with Hematology, Medical Oncology, Hemostaseology, Infectiology and Rheumatology, Oncologic Center, Erlangen, Germany.
Christina FrickeInternal Medicine 2, Gastroenterology and Hepatology and Rheumatology, Karl Landsteiner University of Health Sciences, University Hospital of St. Pölten, St. Pölten, Austria.
Disorn SookthaiInstitut für Klinische Krebsforschung IKF GmbH, Frankfurt, Germany.
Rainer GüntherDepartment of Internal Medicine I, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein (UKSH), Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany.
Andreas SchmidererDepartment of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Endocrinology, University Hospital of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Henning WegeDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Center, Hamburg, Germany.
Marino VeneritoDepartment of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Infectious Diseases, Otto-von-Guericke-University Hospital Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany.
Ursula EhmerInternal Medicine II, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Martina MüllerDepartment of Internal Medicine I, Regensburg University Hospital, Regensburg, Germany.
Christian P StrassburgDepartment of Internal Medicine 1, University Hospital of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Arndt WeinmannDepartment of Medicine I, University Medical Center Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany.
Jürgen SieblerCCC-Erlangen EMN, Erlangen, Germany.
Oliver WaidmannDepartment of Internal Medicine 1, Goethe-University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany.
Christian M LangeDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital and University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
Anna SaborowskiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Endocrinology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Arndt VogelDepartment of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Endocrinology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Medizinische Hochschule Hannover · DEGoethe University Frankfurt · DEJohannes Gutenberg University Mainz · DETUM Klinikum · DEUniversität Hamburg · DEUniversitätsklinikum St. Pölten · ATUniversity Hospital Bonn · DEUniversity Hospital Innsbruck · ATUniversity Hospital Regensburg · DEUniversity of Duisburg-Essen · DEFriedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg · DEGerman Climate Computing Centre · DEInstitute of Clinical Cancer Research · DEUniversitätsklinikum Knappschaftskrankenhaus Bochum · DEUniversity Hospital Magdeburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Lenvatinib is approved as first-line treatment for patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The efficacy of lenvatinib in Caucasian real-world patients is insufficiently defined. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of lenvatinib in a multi-center cohort (ELEVATOR) from Germany and Austria. Methods: A retrospective data analysis of 205 patients treated with first-line systemic lenvatinib at 14 different sites was conducted. Overall survival, progression free survival, overall response rate and adverse event rates were assessed and analyzed. Results: Patients receiving lenvatinib in the real-world setting reached a median overall survival of 12.8 months, which was comparable to the results reported from the REFLECT study. Median overall survival (mOS) and progression free survival (mPFS) was superior in those patients who met the inclusion criteria of the REFLECT study compared to patients who failed to meet the inclusion criteria (mOS 15.6 vs 10.2 months, HR 0.55, 95% CI 0.38-0.81, p=0.002; mPFS 8.1 vs 4.8 months HR 0.65, 95% CI 0.46-0.91, p=0.0015). For patients with an impaired liver function according to the Albumin-Bilirubin (ALBI) grade, or reduced ECOG performance status ≥2, survival was significantly shorter compared to patients with sustained liver function (ALBI grade 1) and good performance status (ECOG performance status 0), respectively (HR 1.69, 95% CI 1.07-2.66, p=0.023; HR 2.25, 95% CI 1.19-4.23, p=0.012). Additionally, macrovascular invasion (HR 1.55, 95% CI 1.02-2.37, p=0.041) and an AFP ≥200 ng/mL (HR 1.56, 95% CI 1.03-2.34, p=0.034) were confirmed as independent negative prognostic factors in our cohort of patients with advanced HCC. Conclusion: Overall, our data confirm the efficacy of lenvatinib as first-line treatment and did not reveal new or unexpected side effects in a large retrospective Caucasian real-world cohort, supporting the use of lenvatinib as meaningful alternative for patients that cannot be treated with IO-based combinations in first-line HCC.

Indexed as

Albumin-bilirubin gradeHepatocellular carcinomaLenvatinibLiver functionReal-world cohortREFLECT study

Identifiers

PMID35949288
PMCPMC9218621
OpenAlexW4206042302

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.