Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35949129›Full record

ArticleAnatolian journal of cardiology2022

Lessons Learned From Intermittent Dysfunction of Mechanical Heart Valve.

Semih Kalkan, Ahmet Güner, Macit Kalçık, Mustafa Ozan Gürsoy, Sabahattin Gündüz, Emrah Bayam, Mahmut Yesin, Süleyman Karakoyun, Mustafa Ferhat Keten, Mehmet Özkan

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Anatolian journal of cardiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Semih KalkanDepartment of Cardiology, Erzurum Training and Research Hospital, Erzurum, Turkey.
Ahmet GünerDepartment of Cardiology, Mehmet Akif Ersoy Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery Training and Research Hospital, İstanbul, Turkey.
Macit KalçıkDepartment of Cardiology, Faculty of Medicine, Hitit University, Çorum, Turkey.
Mustafa Ozan GürsoyDepartment of Cardiology, İzmir Katip Çelebi University Atatürk Training and Research Hospital, İzmir, Turkey.
Sabahattin GündüzDepartment of Cardiology, Bahçeşehir University, Medical Park Hospital, İstanbul, Turkey.
Emrah BayamDepartment of Cardiology, Koşuyolu Kartal Training and Research Hospital, İstanbul, Turkey.
Mahmut YesinDepartment of Cardiology, Kars Kafkas University, Kars, Turkey.
Süleyman KarakoyunFaculty of Health Sciences, Ardahan University, Ardahan, Turkey.
Mustafa Ferhat KetenDepartment of Cardiology, Koşuyolu Kartal Training and Research Hospital, İstanbul, Turkey.
Mehmet ÖzkanDepartment of Cardiology, Koşuyolu Kartal Training and Research Hospital, İstanbul, Turkey; Faculty of Health Sciences, Ardahan University, Ardahan, Turkey.
Ardahan University · TRBahçeşehir University · TRBurdur Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi · TRErzurum Regional Training and Research Hospital · TRHitit Üniversitesi · TRIzmir Kâtip Çelebi University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIntermittent malfunction is a rare but potentially serious complication of prosthetic heart valve replacement. This study aimed to describe the clinical features and etiologic causes of patients with intermittent mechanical prosthetic heart valve dysfunction.

methodsBetween 2010 and 2021, 16 patients who were evaluated in the echocardiography laboratory of Koşuyolu Training and Research Hospital with the diagnosis of intermittent malfunction of prosthetic valves were included in the study.

resultsThe evaluated patients consisted of 12 bi-leaflet mitral valve replacements and 2 mono-leaflet mitral valve replacements. The underlying causes of intermittent malfunction were classified as follows: residual chord (n=4), obstructive thrombus (n=2), non-obstructive thrombus (n=2), vegetation (n=2), pannus and obstructive thrombus coexistence (n=1), and solely pannus (n=1). One of the patients with mono-leaflet mitral valve replacements had pannus and obstructive thrombus. In the other patient with mono-leaflet mitral valve replacement, a stuck valve was observed in 1 of 12 beats secondary to arrhythmia. There were also 2 patients with aortic valve replacements. One patient had moderate aortic regurgitation due to prominent calcification and the other had moderate obstruction due to pannus. In the patient with pannus, a stuck leaflet was observed in 1 of 6 beats and moderate aortic regurgitation arose in 1 of 2 beats in the patient with calcification.

conclusionsThe intermittent stuck valve may have catastrophic outcomes. When making a treatment decision in these patients, assessing the degree of regurgitation or stenosis is essential. In particular, the frequency of entrapment should be taken into consideration when deciding the optimal therapy for intermittent prosthetic heart valve dysfunction.

Indexed as

Aortic Valve InsufficiencyCalcinosisHeart Valve ProsthesisThrombosisAortic ValveHumansProsthesis Failure

Identifiers

PMID35949129
PMCPMC9524199
OpenAlexW4283802507

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.