ArticleAnatolian journal of cardiology2022
Validation of the Turkish Version of the Catheterization Risk Score for Pediatrics.
Article in Anatolian journal of cardiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Impact of Risk Score Use in Predicting Serious Adverse Events During Cardiac Catheterization Procedures in Pediatric Patients.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe aim of this study was to perform a validity analysis of the Turkish version of the Catheterization Risk Score for Pediatrics.
methodsThe study sample consisted of 419 pediatric patients who underwent cardiac catheterization. Patient risk factors and outcomes were collected using the revised (r) Catheterization Risk Score for Pediatric score (21 points) and Catheterization Risk Score for Pediatric score-20 point (Nykanen score). The serious adverse events and nonserious adverse event complications that occurred during and after the procedure were recorded. The revised Catheterization Risk Score for Pediatrics and Catheterization Risk Score for Pediatrics score-20 points were administered by pediatric cardiologists. The content validity index was calculated based on expert opinions. Chi-square, correlation, and regression analyses were used.
resultsThe mean age of the pediatric patients was 4.5 ± 4.8 years. Of the patients, 50.1% were male (n=210) and 85% (n=356) had acyanotic heart disease. The patients' Catheterization Risk Score for Pediatrics score-20 point and revised Catheterization Risk Score for Pediatrics score were 5.9 ± 2.5 (range, 3-16) and 4.0 ± 2.5 (range, 0-16), respectively. Serious adverse events developed in 10.7% (n=45) of the patients and were found to be related with patient status/timing of catheterization, age, weight, respiratory status, and American Society of Anesthesiologist scores (P < .05). Significant positive correlations were found between the incidence of serious adverse events and total revised Catheterization Risk Score for Pediatrics score (21 points), total Catheterization Risk Score for Pediatrics score-20 point, and American Society of Anesthesiologist score (P < .01).
conclusionThe revised Catheterization Risk Score for Pediatrics score (21 points) and Catheterization Risk Score for Pediatrics score-20 point are valid tools for predicting preprocedural risk in the Turkish population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.