ReviewJournal of clinical laboratory analysis2022
Misdiagnosis of a patient with congenital dysfibrinogenemia: A case report and literature review.
Review in Journal of clinical laboratory analysis, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Dysfibrinogenemia in Pregnancy: A Case Series Highlighting Diagnostic Challenges and Multidisciplinary Management.Cureus · 2026Article
- TheFrontiers in neurology · 2024Article
- Misdiagnosis of a patient with congenital dysfibrinogenemia: A case report and literature review.Journal of clinical laboratory analysis · 2022Review
- Laboratory and Clinical Analysis of Rare Coagulation Factor Deficiencies-A Respective Study of a Single Center from Northwest China.Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/HemostasisArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundWe reported a patient with congenital dysfibrinogenemia who was misdiagnosed and reviewed relevant literature, in order to discuss the methods to reduce misdiagnosis.
methodsA 23-year-old pregnant woman was found to be with low fibrinogen in antenatal examination at another province teaching hospital, who was misdiagnosed to have hypofibrinogenemia. Fibrinogen infusion or cryoprecipitation was recommended if necessary. The patient came to our hospital for further diagnosis and treatment considering the safety of herself and the fetus. We examined the coagulation function and gene sequencing of the pregnant woman and her family members.
resultsFibrinogen (Clauss method) was significantly reduced in the patient and her mother, while the level of fibrinogen (PT-derived method) was normal. Thrombin time was prolonged. Heterozygous mutation site was found in exon 2 of the FGA gene, c.104G > A(p.Arg35His).
conclusionWhen the fibrinogen (Clauss method) is significantly reduced and the thrombin time is prolonged, PT-derived method and the investigation of family coagulation function should be added, which can be used to diagnose and distinguish congenital dysfibrinogenemia from hypofibrinogenemia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.