Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35948911›Full record

ArticleParasites & vectors2022

Risk of tick-borne pathogen spillover into urban yards in New York City.

Nichar Gregory, Maria P Fernandez, Maria Diuk-Wasser

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Parasites & vectors, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Why are the ticks winning, and what can we do about it?Ticks and tick-borne diseases · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Nichar Gregory *Department of Ecology, Evolution and Environmental Biology, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA. ng2455@columbia.edu.
Maria P Fernandez *Department of Ecology, Evolution and Environmental Biology, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
Maria Diuk-WasserDepartment of Ecology, Evolution and Environmental Biology, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.

Funding

CDC HHS U01CK000509-01National Science Foundation's Coupled Natural Human Systems 2/Dynamics of Integrated Socio-Environmental Systems 1924061NCEZID CDC HHS U01 CK000509Northeast Regional Center for Excellence in Vector Borne Diseases U01CK000509-01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe incidence of tick-borne disease has increased dramatically in recent decades, with urban areas increasingly recognized as high-risk environments for exposure to infected ticks. Green spaces may play a key role in facilitating the invasion of ticks, hosts and pathogens into residential areas, particularly where they connect residential yards with larger natural areas (e.g. parks). However, the factors mediating tick distribution across heterogeneous urban landscapes remain poorly characterized.

methodsUsing generalized linear models in a multimodel inference framework, we determined the residential yard- and local landscape-level features associated with the presence of three tick species of current and growing public health importance in residential yards across Staten Island, a borough of New York City, in the state of New York, USA.

resultsThe amount and configuration of canopy cover immediately surrounding residential yards was found to strongly predict the presence of Ixodes scapularis and Amblyomma americanum, but not that of Haemaphysalis longicornis. Within yards, we found a protective effect of fencing against I. scapularis and A. americanum, but not against H. longicornis. For all species, the presence of log and brush piles strongly increased the odds of finding ticks in yards.

conclusionsThe results highlight a considerable risk of tick exposure in residential yards in Staten Island and identify both yard- and landscape-level features associated with their distribution. In particular, the significance of log and brush piles for all three species supports recommendations for yard management as a means of reducing contact with ticks.

Indexed as

IxodesIxodidaeTick BitesTick-Borne DiseasesAnimalsHumansNew York CityAmblyommaHaemaphysalisIxodesLandscape metricsUrban tick-borne disease

Identifiers

PMID35948911
PMCPMC9365221

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.