Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35948879›Full record

Trial reportBMC ophthalmology2022

Visual performance, safety and patient satisfaction after bilateral implantation of a trifocal intraocular lens in presbyopic patients without cataract.

Joaquín Fernández, José F Alfonso Sánchez, Mark Nieradzik, Beatriz Valcárcel, Noemí Burguera, Alexander Kapp

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC ophthalmology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03790592 (Visual Outcomes and Patient Satisfaction After Presbyopic Lens Exchange With a Trifocal Intraocular Lens), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03790592 nacompletednot on this map

Visual Outcomes and Patient Satisfaction After Presbyopic Lens Exchange With a Trifocal Intraocular Lens (IOL)

TypeinterventionalSponsorCarl Zeiss Meditec AGRan2019 to 2019Enrolled36ConditionsPresbyopiaArmstrifocal IOL
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Surgical interventions for presbyopia.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Joaquín FernándezQvision, Department of Ophthalmology of VITHAS Almería Hospital, 04120, Almería, Spain. joaquinfernandezoft@Qvision.es.
José F Alfonso SánchezFernández-Vega Ophthalmological Institute, Av. Doctores Fernández Vega, 34, 33012, Oviedo, Asturias, Spain.
Mark NieradzikAugenzentrum Michelfeld, Daimlerstraße 60, 74545, Michelfeld, Germany.
Beatriz ValcárcelFernández-Vega Ophthalmological Institute, Av. Doctores Fernández Vega, 34, 33012, Oviedo, Asturias, Spain.
Noemí BurgueraQvision, Department of Ophthalmology of VITHAS Almería Hospital, 04120, Almería, Spain.
Alexander KappAugenzentrum Michelfeld, Daimlerstraße 60, 74545, Michelfeld, Germany.
Fernández-Vega Ophthalmological Institute · ESRückenzentrum am Michel · DEUniversity of Almería · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe aim was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a trifocal intraocular lens (IOL) for the correction of presbyopia and to assess patient satisfaction.

methodsRecords from three centres were reviewed to select presbyopic patients having undergone bilateral refractive lens exchange and implantation of the AT LISA tri 839MP multifocal IOL. Postoperatively, monocular and binocular distance, intermediate and near visual acuities, corrected and uncorrected, and subjective refraction were measured. Patients also completed a quality of life questionnaire. Safety evaluation included IOL stability and postoperative complications.

results72 eyes (36 patients) were analysed. No clinically significant difference between pre- and postoperative corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) was found for monocular or binocular measurements. Mean postoperative monocular CDVA was 0.02 ± 0.04 logMAR. Mean refractive values all improved statistically significantly compared with preoperative baseline (p ≤ 0.0064). Overall, 82.4% of eyes had spherical equivalent within ± 0.5 D and 97.1% within ± 1.0 D of emmetropia with a mean accuracy of -0.10 ± 0.41 D. Spectacle independence for distance, intermediate and near visual acuity was 87.5%, 84.4% and 78.1% respectively, and 78.1% of patients were satisfied with their postoperative, spectacle-free vision. Eight eyes received Nd:YAG laser treatment. No other IOL-related safety issues were reported.

conclusionAT LISA tri 839MP multifocal IOL bilaterally implanted in presbyopic patients provided excellent distance, intermediate and near visual outcomes with very accurate correction of refraction. These results were associated with a high level of spectacle independence and patient satisfaction.

trial registrationTrial registered on https://clinicaltrials.gov/ under the identification NCT03790592 (31/12/2018).

Indexed as

CataractLenses, IntraocularPresbyopiaHumansPatient SatisfactionProspective StudiesProsthesis DesignQuality of LifeRefraction, OcularMultifocal Intraocular LensesPatient satisfactionPresbyopiaRefractive lens exchangeTrifocalVisual function

Identifiers

PMID35948879
PMCPMC9364506
OpenAlexW4291020295

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.