ArticleMedical & biological engineering & computing2022
Identifying the tumor location-associated candidate genes in development of new drugs for colorectal cancer using machine-learning-based approach.
Article in Medical & biological engineering & computing, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Numerous studies have been conducted to elucidate the relation of tumor proximity to cancer prognosis and treatment efficacy in colorectal cancer. However, the molecular pathways and prognoses of left- and right-sided colorectal cancers are different, and this difference has not been fully investigated at the genomic level. In this study, a set of data science approaches, including six feature selection methods and three classification models, were used in predicting tumor location from gene expression profiles. Specificity, sensitivity, accuracy, and Mathew's correlation coefficient (MCC) evaluation metrics were used to evaluate the classification ability. Gene ontology enrichment analysis was applied by the Gene Ontology PANTHER Classification System. For the most significant 50 genes, protein-protein interactions and drug-gene interactions were analyzed using the GeneMANIA, CytoScape, CytoHubba, MCODE, and DGIdb databases. The highest classification accuracy (90%) is achieved with the most significant 200 genes when the ensemble-decision tree classification model is used with the ReliefF feature selection method. Molecular pathways and drug interactions are investigated for the most significant 50 genes. It is concluded that a machine-learning-based approach could be useful to discover the significant genes that may have an important role in the development of new therapies and drugs for colorectal cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.