Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35948694›Full record

Trial reportJournal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO2022

Rate Discrimination Training May Partially Restore Temporal Processing Abilities from Age-Related Deficits.

Samira Anderson, Lindsay DeVries, Edward Smith, Matthew J Goupell, Sandra Gordon-Salant

Open access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Aging in the Primary Auditory Cortex.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Editorial: Views on JARO 2023.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Samira AndersonDepartment of Hearing and Speech Sciences, University of Maryland, College Park, 20742, USA. sander22@umd.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-0731-4574
Lindsay DeVriesDepartment of Hearing and Speech Sciences, University of Maryland, College Park, 20742, USA.
Edward SmithDepartment of Hearing and Speech Sciences, University of Maryland, College Park, 20742, USA.
Matthew J GoupellDepartment of Hearing and Speech Sciences, University of Maryland, College Park, 20742, USA.
Sandra Gordon-SalantDepartment of Hearing and Speech Sciences, University of Maryland, College Park, 20742, USA.
University of Maryland, College Park · US

Funding

Speech Perception with High Cognitive DemandP01AG055365 · NIA · UNIV OF MARYLAND, COLLEGE PARK · PI GORDON-SALANT, SANDRA M · 2017 to 2021
$8.4M
NIA NIH HHS P01 AG055365
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ability to understand speech in complex environments depends on the brain's ability to preserve the precise timing characteristics of the speech signal. Age-related declines in temporal processing may contribute to the older adult's experience of communication difficulty in challenging listening conditions. This study's purpose was to evaluate the effects of rate discrimination training on auditory temporal processing. A double-blind, randomized control design assigned 77 young normal-hearing, older normal-hearing, and older hearing-impaired listeners to one of two treatment groups: experimental (rate discrimination for 100- and 300-Hz pulse trains) and active control (tone detection in noise). All listeners were evaluated during pre- and post-training sessions using perceptual rate discrimination of 100-, 200-, 300-, and 400-Hz band-limited pulse trains and auditory steady-state responses (ASSRs) to the same stimuli. Training generalization was evaluated using several temporal processing measures and sentence recognition tests that included time-compressed and reverberant speech stimuli. Results demonstrated a session × training group interaction for perceptual and ASSR testing to the trained frequencies (100 and 300 Hz), driven by greater improvements in the training group than in the active control group. Further, post-test rate discrimination of the older listeners reached levels that were equivalent to those of the younger listeners at pre-test. Generalization was observed in significant improvement in rate discrimination of untrained frequencies (200 and 400 Hz) and in correlations between performance changes in rate discrimination and sentence recognition of reverberant speech. Further, non-auditory inhibition/attention performance predicted training-related improvement in rate discrimination. Overall, the results demonstrate the potential for auditory training to partially restore temporal processing in older listeners and highlight the role of cognitive function in these gains.

Indexed as

Hearing LossSpeech PerceptionTime PerceptionAgedAuditory PerceptionHumansNoiseAgingAuditory steady-state responseAuditory TrainingSpeech perceptionTemporal processing

Identifiers

PMID35948694
PMCPMC9365219
OpenAlexW4291019367

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.