ReviewPathologie (Heidelberg, Germany)2022
[Interlaboratory comparisons-a central means of external quality assurance].
Review in Pathologie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- [German expert consensus on programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) testing in perioperative systemic therapy of muscle invasive bladder cancer].Urologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The precise performance of immunohistochemical and molecular examinations of diagnostic and predictive markers is essential for the further therapy of patients. Due to the increasing number of biomarkers and their detection at the immunohistochemical and molecular level in patient tissue, the pathology has a direct influence on the therapy of patients, which increases the value of external quality assurance (EQA). In pathology, various forms are available for this purpose, such as proficiency tests. The standards of both the certification and accreditation procedures of pathology require regular participation in EQA and a statement on the EQA policy of the institutes. The quality of an EQA depends on the scientific concept, the adequate selection of material, the evaluation concept, and the communication of results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
35948656What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.