Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35948555›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

The global contribution of invasive vertebrate eradication as a key island restoration tool.

Dena R Spatz, Nick D Holmes, David J Will, Stella Hein, Zachary T Carter, Rachel M Fewster, Bradford Keitt, Piero Genovesi, Araceli Samaniego, Donald A Croll and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Tracking the global application of conservation translocation and social attraction to reverse seabird declines.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Decadal change in seabird-driven isotopes on islands with differing invasion histories.Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Island restoration to rebuild seabird populations and amplify coral reef functioning.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2025
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Dena R SpatzPacific Rim Conservation, Honolulu, HI, USA. denarspatz@gmail.com.
Nick D HolmesThe Nature Conservancy, Santa Cruz, CA, USA.
David J WillIsland Conservation, Santa Cruz, CA, USA.
Stella HeinIsland Conservation, Santa Cruz, CA, USA.
Zachary T CarterUniversity of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Rachel M FewsterUniversity of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Bradford KeittAmerican Bird Conservancy, Santa Cruz, CA, USA.
Piero GenovesiInstitute for Environmental Protection and Research (ISPRA), Rome, Italy.
Araceli SamaniegoManaaki Whenua-Landcare Research, Auckland, New Zealand.
Donald A CrollUC Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA, USA.
Bernie R TershyUC Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA, USA.
James C RussellUniversity of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Islands are global hotspots for biodiversity and extinction, representing ~ 5% of Earth's land area alongside 40% of globally threatened vertebrates and 61% of global extinctions since the 1500s. Invasive species are the primary driver of native biodiversity loss on islands, though eradication of invasive species from islands has been effective at halting or reversing these trends. A global compendium of this conservation tool is essential for scaling best-practices and enabling innovations to maximize biodiversity outcomes. Here, we synthesize over 100 years of invasive vertebrate eradications from islands, comprising 1550 eradication attempts on 998 islands, with an 88% success rate. We show a significant growth in eradication activity since the 1980s, primarily driven by rodent eradications. The annual number of eradications on islands peaked in the mid-2000s, but the annual area treated continues to rise dramatically. This trend reflects increases in removal efficacy and project complexity, generating increased conservation gains. Our synthesis demonstrates the collective contribution of national interventions towards global biodiversity outcomes. Further investment in invasive vertebrate eradications from islands will expand biodiversity conservation while strengthening biodiversity resilience to climate change and creating co-benefits for human societies.

Indexed as

BiodiversityConservation of Natural ResourcesAnimalsClimate ChangeHumansIntroduced SpeciesVertebrates

Identifiers

PMID35948555
PMCPMC9365850

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.