Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35948550›Full record

ArticleNature communications2022

Thermodynamics of high-pressure ice phases explored with atomistic simulations.

Aleks Reinhardt, Mandy Bethkenhagen, Federica Coppari, Marius Millot, Sebastien Hamel, Bingqing Cheng

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Phase transition kinetics of superionic HNature communications · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Aleks ReinhardtYusuf Hamied Department of Chemistry, University of Cambridge, Lensfield Road, Cambridge, CB2 1EW, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9393-3429
Mandy BethkenhagenÉcole Normale Supérieure de Lyon, Université Lyon 1, Laboratoire de Géologie de Lyon, CNRS UMR 5276, 69364, Lyon Cedex 07, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1838-2129
Federica CoppariLawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA, 94550, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1592-3898
Marius MillotLawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA, 94550, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4414-3532
Sebastien HamelLawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA, 94550, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4246-0892
Bingqing ChengInstitute of Science and Technology Austria, Am Campus 1, 3400, Klosterneuburg, Austria. bingqing.cheng@ist.ac.at.
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory · USInstitute of Science and Technology Austria · ATUniversité Claude Bernard Lyon 1 · FRUniversity of Cambridge · GB

Funding

RCUK | Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) EP/P020259/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Most experimentally known high-pressure ice phases have a body-centred cubic (bcc) oxygen lattice. Our large-scale molecular-dynamics simulations with a machine-learning potential indicate that, amongst these bcc ice phases, ices VII, VII' and X are the same thermodynamic phase under different conditions, whereas superionic ice VII″ has a first-order phase boundary with ice VII'. Moreover, at about 300 GPa, the transformation between ice X and the Pbcm phase has a sharp structural change but no apparent activation barrier, whilst at higher pressures the barrier gradually increases. Our study thus clarifies the phase behaviour of the high-pressure ices and reveals peculiar solid-solid transition mechanisms not known in other systems.

Identifiers

PMID35948550
PMCPMC9365810
OpenAlexW4290989482

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.