Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35948428›Full record

ArticleAccounts of chemical research2022

Autonomous Chemical Experiments: Challenges and Perspectives on Establishing a Self-Driving Lab.

Martin Seifrid, Robert Pollice, Andrés Aguilar-Granda, Zamyla Morgan Chan, Kazuhiro Hotta, Cher Tian Ser, Jenya Vestfrid, Tony C Wu, Alán Aspuru-Guzik

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Accounts of chemical research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 57 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
57citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

57 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Superintelligence: A Crucial Juncture in the Development of Healthcare Sciences and Public Health.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Elements and roadmap for interactive molecular graphics and modeling "in the Holodeck".Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2026
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Martin SeifridDepartment of Chemistry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M5S 3H6, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-5238-0058
Robert PolliceDepartment of Chemistry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M5S 3H6, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-8836-6266
Andrés Aguilar-GrandaDepartment of Chemistry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M5S 3H6, Canada.
Zamyla Morgan ChanDepartment of Chemistry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M5S 3H6, Canada.
Kazuhiro HottaDepartment of Chemistry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M5S 3H6, Canada.
Cher Tian SerDepartment of Chemistry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M5S 3H6, Canada.
Jenya VestfridDepartment of Chemistry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M5S 3H6, Canada.
Tony C WuDepartment of Chemistry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M5S 3H6, Canada.
Alán Aspuru-GuzikDepartment of Chemistry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M5S 3H6, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-8277-4434

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We must accelerate the pace at which we make technological advancements to address climate change and disease risks worldwide. This swifter pace of discovery requires faster research and development cycles enabled by better integration between hypothesis generation, design, experimentation, and data analysis. Typical research cycles take months to years. However, data-driven automated laboratories, or self-driving laboratories, can significantly accelerate molecular and materials discovery. Recently, substantial advancements have been made in the areas of machine learning and optimization algorithms that have allowed researchers to extract valuable knowledge from multidimensional data sets. Machine learning models can be trained on large data sets from the literature or databases, but their performance can often be hampered by a lack of negative results or metadata. In contrast, data generated by self-driving laboratories can be information-rich, containing precise details of the experimental conditions and metadata. Consequently, much larger amounts of high-quality data are gathered in self-driving laboratories. When placed in open repositories, this data can be used by the research community to reproduce experiments, for more in-depth analysis, or as the basis for further investigation. Accordingly, high-quality open data sets will increase the accessibility and reproducibility of science, which is sorely needed.In this Account, we describe our efforts to build a self-driving lab for the development of a new class of materials: organic semiconductor lasers (OSLs). Since they have only recently been demonstrated, little is known about the molecular and material design rules for thin-film, electrically-pumped OSL devices as compared to other technologies such as organic light-emitting diodes or organic photovoltaics. To realize high-performing OSL materials, we are developing a flexible system for automated synthesis via iterative Suzuki-Miyaura cross-coupling reactions. This automated synthesis platform is directly coupled to the analysis and purification capabilities. Subsequently, the molecules of interest can be transferred to an optical characterization setup. We are currently limited to optical measurements of the OSL molecules in solution. However, material properties are ultimately most important in the solid state (e.g., as a thin-film device). To that end and for a different scientific goal, we are developing a self-driving lab for inorganic thin-film materials focused on the oxygen evolution reaction.While the future of self-driving laboratories is very promising, numerous challenges still need to be overcome. These challenges can be split into cognition and motor function. Generally, the cognitive challenges are related to optimization with constraints or unexpected outcomes for which general algorithmic solutions have yet to be developed. A more practical challenge that could be resolved in the near future is that of software control and integration because few instrument manufacturers design their products with self-driving laboratories in mind. Challenges in motor function are largely related to handling heterogeneous systems, such as dispensing solids or performing extractions. As a result, it is critical to understand that adapting experimental procedures that were designed for human experimenters is not as simple as transferring those same actions to an automated system, and there may be more efficient ways to achieve the same goal in an automated fashion. Accordingly, for self-driving laboratories, we need to carefully rethink the translation of manual experimental protocols.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsLaboratoriesHumansReproducibility of Results

Identifiers

PMID35948428
PMCPMC9454899

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.