Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35948405›Full record

SynthesisArchives of disease in childhood2022

Antibiotic use in ambulatory care for acutely ill children in high-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Ruben Burvenich, Hannelore Dillen, Nhung T H Trinh, Joseph Freer, Laure Wynants, Stefan Heytens, An De Sutter, Jan Y Verbakel

Open access · hybridAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Archives of disease in childhood, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Effectiveness of safety-netting approaches for acutely ill children: a network meta-analysis.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Antibiotics for acute otitis media in children.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023
    Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 5 countries.

Ruben Burvenich *Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium ruben.burvenich@kuleuven.be.ORCID 0000-0003-1977-6071
Hannelore Dillen *Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-3242-2318
Nhung T H TrinhDepartment of Pharmacy, and PharmaTox Strategic Research Initiative, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0003-2794-5322
Joseph FreerInstitute of Population Health Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5114-7059
Laure WynantsDepartment of Epidemiology, CAPHRI Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-3037-122X
Stefan HeytensDepartment of Family Medicine and Primary Healthcare, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0003-1097-4987
An De SutterDepartment of Family Medicine and Primary Healthcare, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-2540-8307
Jan Y VerbakelDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-7166-7211
Ghent University Hospital · BEKU Leuven · BEMaastricht University · NLQueen Mary University of London · GBUniversity of Oslo · NOUniversity of Oxford · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo determine the rate and appropriateness of antibiotic prescribing for acutely ill children in ambulatory care in high-income countries.

designOn 10 February 2021, we systematically searched articles published since 2000 in MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, Web Of Science and grey literature databases. We included cross-sectional and longitudinal studies, time-series analyses, randomised controlled trials and non-randomised studies of interventions with acutely ill children up to and including 12 years of age in ambulatory care settings in high-income countries. Pooled antibiotic prescribing and appropriateness rates were calculated using random-effects models. Meta-regression was performed to describe the relationship between the antibiotic prescribing rate and study-level covariates.

resultsWe included 86 studies comprising 11 114 863 children. We found a pooled antibiotic prescribing rate of 45.4% (95% CI 38.2% to 52.8%) for all acutely ill children, and 85.6% (95% CI 73.3% to 92.9%) for acute otitis media, 37.4% (95% CI 30.9% to 44.3%) for respiratory tract infections, and 40.4% (95% CI 29.9% to 51.9%) for other diagnoses. Considerable heterogeneity can only partly be explained by differences in diagnoses. The overall pooled appropriateness rate is 68.5% (95% CI 55.8% to 78.9%, I²=99.8%; 19 studies, 119 995 participants). 38.3% of all prescribed antibiotics were aminopenicillins.

conclusionsAntibiotic prescribing rates for acutely ill children in ambulatory care in high-income countries remain high. Large differences in prescription rates between studies can only partly be explained by differences in diagnoses. Better registration and further research are needed to investigate patient-level data on diagnosis and appropriateness.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsRespiratory Tract InfectionsAmbulatory CareChildCross-Sectional StudiesDeveloped CountriesHumansAnti-Bacterial Agentschild healthcommunicable diseasesemergency carepaediatricsprimary health care

Identifiers

PMID35948405
PMCPMC9685710
OpenAlexW4291020019

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.