Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35948031›Full record

ArticleJournal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN2022

Association of Polypharmacy and Potentially Inappropriate Medications With Frailty Among Older Adults With Blood Cancers.

Tammy T Hshieh, Clark DuMontier, Timothy Jaung, Nupur E Bahl, Chelsea E Hawley, Lee Mozessohn, Richard M Stone, Robert J Soiffer, Jane A Driver, Gregory A Abel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Nails in older adults.Annals of medicine · 2024
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Feasibility of a comprehensive medication review to improve medication use for patients with cancer and comorbid conditions.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Tammy T HshiehDivision of Aging, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Clark DuMontierDivision of Aging, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Timothy JaungNew England Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center, Bedford, Massachusetts.
Nupur E BahlNew England Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center, Bedford, Massachusetts.
Chelsea E HawleyNew England Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center, Bedford, Massachusetts.
Lee MozessohnSunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; and.
Richard M StoneHarvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Robert J SoifferHarvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Jane A DriverDivision of Aging, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Gregory A AbelHarvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.

Funding

Trageting the Multiple Myeloma EpigenomeP50CA100707 · NCI · DANA-FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE · PI ANDERSON, KENNETH C., MUNSHI, NIKHIL C. · 2003 to 2023
$45.0M
TUFTS--FIELDINGP30AG031679 · NIA · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI Ravi Jasuja · 2008 to 2026
$23.9M
CSRD VA IK2 CX002218NCI NIH HHS P50 CA100707NIA NIH HHS P30 AG031679
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPolypharmacy and potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) are common among older adults with blood cancers, but their association with frailty and how to manage them optimally remain unclear. PATIENTS AND

methodsFrom 2015 to 2019, patients aged ≥75 years presenting for initial oncology consult underwent screening geriatric assessment. Patients were determined to be robust, prefrail, or frail via deficit accumulation and phenotypic approaches. We quantified each patient's total number of medications and PIMs using the Anticholinergic Risk Scale (ARS) and a scale we generated using the NCCN Medications of Concern called the Geriatric Oncology Potentially Inappropriate Medications (GO-PIM) scale. We assessed cross-sectional associations of PIMs with frailty in multivariable regression models adjusting for age, gender, and comorbidity.

resultsOf 785 patients assessed, 603 (77%) were taking ≥5 medications and 421 (54%) were taking ≥8 medications; 201 (25%) were taking at least 1 PIM based on the ARS and 343 (44%) at least 1 PIM based on the GO-PIM scale. Among the 468 (60%) patients on active cancer treatment, taking ≥8 medications was associated with frailty (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 2.82; 95% CI, 1.92-4.17). With each additional medication, the odds of being prefrail or frail increased 8% (aOR, 1.08; 95% CI, 1.04-1.12). With each 1-point increase on the ARS, the odds of being prefrail or frail increased 19% (aOR, 1.19; 95% CI, 1.03-1.39); with each additional PIM based on the GO-PIM scale, the odds increased 65% (aOR, 1.65; 95% CI, 1.34-2.04).

conclusionsPolypharmacy and PIMs are prevalent among older patients with blood cancers; taking ≥8 medications is strongly associated with frailty. These data suggest careful medication reconciliation for this population may be helpful, and deprescribing when possible is high-yield, especially for PIMs on the GO-PIM scale.

Indexed as

FrailtyNeoplasmsAgedCross-Sectional StudiesHumansPolypharmacyPotentially Inappropriate Medication List

Identifiers

PMID35948031
PMCPMC10106100

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.