Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35947663›Full record

ArticleScience advances2022

Transfer from spatial education to verbal reasoning and prediction of transfer from learning-related neural change.

Robert A Cortes, Emily G Peterson, David J M Kraemer, Robert A Kolvoord, David H Uttal, Nhi Dinh, Adam B Weinberger, Richard J Daker, Ian M Lyons, Daniel Goldman and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Science advances, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Individual differences in navigation skill: towards reliable and valid measures.Cognitive research: principles and implications · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. A dual-process model for cognitive training.NPJ science of learning · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Robert A CortesDepartment of Psychology, Georgetown University, DC, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1106-9452
Emily G PetersonSchool of Education, American University, DC, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9548-6274
David J M KraemerDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9829-2029
Robert A KolvoordCollege of Integrated Science and Engineering, James Madison University, Harrisonburg, VA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9678-8178
David H UttalDepartment of Psychology, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7194-4370
Nhi DinhDepartment of Psychology, Georgetown University, DC, USA.
Adam B WeinbergerDepartment of Psychology, Georgetown University, DC, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5115-1162
Richard J DakerDepartment of Psychology, Georgetown University, DC, USA.
Ian M LyonsDepartment of Psychology, Georgetown University, DC, USA.
Daniel GoldmanDepartment of Psychology, Georgetown University, DC, USA.
Adam E GreenDepartment of Psychology, Georgetown University, DC, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4178-836X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Current debate surrounds the promise of neuroscience for education, including whether learning-related neural changes can predict learning transfer better than traditional performance-based learning assessments. Longstanding debate in philosophy and psychology concerns the proposition that spatial processes underlie seemingly nonspatial/verbal reasoning (mental model theory). If so, education that fosters spatial cognition might improve verbal reasoning. Here, in a quasi-experimental design in real-world STEM classrooms, a curriculum devised to foster spatial cognition yielded transfer to improved verbal reasoning. Further indicating a spatial basis for verbal transfer, students' spatial cognition gains predicted and mediated their reasoning improvement. Longitudinal fMRI detected learning-related changes in neural activity, connectivity, and representational similarity in spatial cognition-implicated regions. Neural changes predicted and mediated learning transfer. Ensemble modeling demonstrated better prediction of transfer from neural change than from traditional measures (tests and grades). Results support in-school "spatial education" and suggest that neural change can inform future development of transferable curricula.

Identifiers

PMID35947663
PMCPMC9365289

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.