Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35947613›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

Chromosomal painting in Charadrius collaris Vieillot, 1818 and Vanellus chilensis Molina, 1782 and an analysis of chromosomal signatures in Charadriiformes.

Melquizedec Luiz Silva Pinheiro, Cleusa Yoshiko Nagamachi, Talita Fernanda Augusto Ribas, Cristovam Guerreiro Diniz, Patricia Caroline Mary O Brien, Malcolm Andrew Ferguson-Smith, Fengtang Yang, Julio Cesar Pieczarka

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Melquizedec Luiz Silva PinheiroLaboratório de Citogenética, Centro de Estudos Avançados da Biodiversidade, ICB, Universidade Federal do Pará, Belém, Pará, Brazil.
Cleusa Yoshiko NagamachiLaboratório de Citogenética, Centro de Estudos Avançados da Biodiversidade, ICB, Universidade Federal do Pará, Belém, Pará, Brazil.
Talita Fernanda Augusto RibasLaboratório de Citogenética, Centro de Estudos Avançados da Biodiversidade, ICB, Universidade Federal do Pará, Belém, Pará, Brazil.
Cristovam Guerreiro DinizLaboratório de Biologia Molecular e Neuroecologia, Instituto Federal do Pará, Campus de Bragança, Bragança, Pará, Brazil.
Patricia Caroline Mary O BrienDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, Cambridge Resource Centre for Comparative Genomics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Malcolm Andrew Ferguson-SmithDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, Cambridge Resource Centre for Comparative Genomics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Fengtang YangCytogenetics Facility, Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, Cambridgeshire, United Kingdom.
Julio Cesar PieczarkaLaboratório de Citogenética, Centro de Estudos Avançados da Biodiversidade, ICB, Universidade Federal do Pará, Belém, Pará, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-2951-8877

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Charadriiformes represent one of the largest orders of birds; members of this order are diverse in morphology, behavior and reproduction, making them an excellent model for studying evolution. It is accepted that the avian putative ancestral karyotype, with 2n = 80, remains conserved for about 100 million years. So far, only a few species of Charadriiformes have been studied using molecular cytogenetics. Here, we performed chromosome painting on metphase chromosomes of two species of Charadriidae, Charadrius collaris and Vanellus chilensis, with whole chromosome paint probes from Burhinus oedicnemus. Charadrius collaris has a diploid number of 76, with both sex chromosomes being submetacentric. In V. chilensi a diploid number of 78 was identified, and the Z chromosome is submetacentric. Chromosome painting suggests that chromosome conservation is a characteristic common to the family Charadriidae. The results allowed a comparative analysis between the three suborders of Charadriiformes and the order Gruiformes using chromosome rearrangements to understand phylogenetic relationships between species and karyotypic evolution. However, the comparative analysis between the Charadriiformes suborders so far has not revealed any shared rearrangements, indicating that each suborder follows an independent evolutionary path, as previously proposed. Likewise, although the orders Charadriiformes and Gruiformes are placed on sister branches, they do not share any signature chromosomal rearrangements.

Indexed as

AmphipodaCharadriiformesAnimalsBirdsChromosome PaintingEvolution, MolecularPhylogenySex Chromosomes

Identifiers

PMID35947613
PMCPMC9365183

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.