Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35947587›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

Incorporation of copaiba and oregano essential oils on the shelf life of fresh ground beef patties under display: Evaluation of their impact on quality parameters and sensory attributes.

Silvana Mari Belloli Leite, Esther Morais da Silva Assunção, Anandra Vitória das Neves Gurgel Alves, Edymeiko de Souza Maciel, Laura Adriane de Moraes Pinto, Isabelle Naemi Kaneko, Ana Guerrero, Ana Paula Folmer Correa, Jovanir Inês Müller Fernandes, Nívia Pires Lopes and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Enhancing Ground Beef Shelf Life UsingFood science & nutrition · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Silvana Mari Belloli LeiteDepartment of Animal Science, Federal University of Roraima, Boa Vista, Roraima, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-3678-0291
Esther Morais da Silva AssunçãoDepartment of Animal Science, Federal University of Roraima, Boa Vista, Roraima, Brazil.
Anandra Vitória das Neves Gurgel AlvesDepartment of Animal Science, Federal University of Roraima, Boa Vista, Roraima, Brazil.
Edymeiko de Souza MacielDepartment of Animal Science, Federal University of Roraima, Boa Vista, Roraima, Brazil.
Laura Adriane de Moraes PintoDepartment of Animal Science, Federal University of Paraná, Palotina, Paraná, Brazil.
Isabelle Naemi KanekoDepartment of Animal Science, Federal University of Rondônia Foundation, Rondônia, Brazil.
Ana GuerreroFacultad de Veterinaria, Departamento Producción y Sanidad Animal, Universidad Cardenal Herrera-CEU, CEU Universities, Alfara del Patriarca, Valencia, España, Spain.
Ana Paula Folmer CorreaBiodiversity Study Center, Federal University of Roraima, Boa Vista, Roraima, Brazil.
Jovanir Inês Müller FernandesDepartment of Animal Science, Federal University of Paraná, Palotina, Paraná, Brazil.
Nívia Pires LopesDepartment of Animal Science, Federal University of Roraima, Boa Vista, Roraima, Brazil.
Marcos José Salgado VitalBiodiversity Study Center, Federal University of Roraima, Boa Vista, Roraima, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-9701-5118
Jéssica de Oliveira MonteschioDepartment of Animal Science, Federal University of Roraima, Boa Vista, Roraima, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-1331-3260
Universidade Federal de Roraima · BRUniversidade Federal do Paraná · BRUniversidad Cardenal Herrera CEU · ESUniversidade Federal de Rondônia · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The preservative effect of the addition of different essential oils (copaiba and oregano) on meat quality parameters and sensorial acceptability was analyzed for fresh ground beef patties over 21 days of display. Five treatments were assessed: control (CON) without antioxidants; addition of the synthetic additive butylated hydroxytoluene (BHT); addition 0.05% of copaiba essential oil (CEO); 0.05% of oregano essential oil (OEO); or blend of 0.025% copaiba and 0.025% oregano essential oils (BEO). The lowest cooking losses and greatest tenderness (P <0.05) were reached with the blend (BEO). The inclusion of oregano essential oil presented a more intense chroma (P <0.05), with the best color retained during display. Oregano essential oil (OEO) and the blend (BEO) showed the highest antioxidant activity, reducing the lipid oxidation of beef patties during display (P < 0.05). Consumers preferred the odor of beef patties with essential oils (OEO and BEO) to the CON; however, the flavor from OEO had the lowest acceptability and the worst scores for overall acceptability (P < 0.05). Patties with the blend addition (BEO) were the best scored on overall acceptability assessments. In conclusion, the oregano and copaiba essential oils blend had a good preservative effect on fresh beef patties during display and increased sensory acceptability of the product, thus being a possible alternative for replacing synthetic compounds in processed foods.

Indexed as

Oils, VolatileOriganumAnimalsAntioxidantsCattleCookingMeatAntioxidantsOils, Volatile

Identifiers

PMID35947587
PMCPMC9365165
OpenAlexW4291674503

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.