Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35947422›Full record

ArticleJMIR research protocols2022

Reducing New Chlamydia Infection Among Young Men by Promoting Correct and Consistent Condom Use: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial.

Nicole Stone, Rowena Bedford, Katie Newby, Katherine Brown, Louise Jackson, Stephen Bremner, Leanne Morrison, Nuala McGrath, Tom Nadarzynski, Jake Bayley and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR research protocols, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Nicole Stone *Department of Psychology, Faculty of Environmental and Life Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0995-8699
Rowena Bedford *Department of Psychology, Faculty of Environmental and Life Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7992-9936
Katie Newby *Department of Psychology and Sports Science, Faculty of Life and Medical Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, Hertfordshire, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9348-0116
Katherine Brown *Department of Psychology and Sports Science, Faculty of Life and Medical Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, Hertfordshire, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2472-5754
Louise Jackson *Institute of Applied Health Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8492-0020
Stephen Bremner *Department of Primary Care and Public Health, Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Brighton, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0790-7070
Leanne Morrison *Department of Psychology, Faculty of Environmental and Life Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9961-551X
Nuala McGrath *School of Primary Care, Population Sciences and Medical Education, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1039-0159
Tom Nadarzynski *School of Social Sciences, University of Westminster, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7010-5308
Jake Bayley *Barts Health NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9957-9064
Nicky Perry *University Hospitals Sussex NHS Trust, Brighton, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3462-130X
Cynthia Graham *Department of Psychology, Faculty of Environmental and Life Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7884-599X
University of Southampton · GBUniversity of Hertfordshire · GBBarts Health NHS Trust · GBBrighton and Sussex Medical School · GBUniversity Hospitals Sussex NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity of Birmingham · GBUniversity of Westminster · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe health, social, and economic costs of sexually transmitted infections (STIs) represent a major public health concern. Young people are considered one of the groups most at risk for acquiring and transmitting STIs. Correct and consistent condom use has been shown to be the most effective method for reducing STIs; however, condoms are often not used properly. Evidence shows that brief behavior change interventions that focus on skills, communication, and motivation to acquire safe sex practices should be adopted into routine care to reduce STIs. Funding for sexual health services in England has declined dramatically, so novel ways of reducing clinic attendance are being sought. The home-based intervention strategy (HIS-UK) to promote condom use among young men has shown promise in feasibility and pilot studies by demonstrating high acceptability of the intervention in participant and health professional feedback, including aiding men to find condoms they like and feel more confident when using condoms.

objectiveThe aim of this study is to determine the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of HIS-UK when compared to usual condom distribution care among young men.

methodsThe 3 trial arms consisting of "e-HIS" (HIS-UK delivered digitally), "ProHIS" (HIS-UK delivered face-to-face), and control condition (usual National Health Service [NHS] care) will be compared against the following 3 primary outcomes: the extent to which correct and consistent condom use is increased; improvement of condom use experiences (pleasure as well as fit and feel); and decrease in chlamydia test positivity. Eligibility criteria include men aged 16-25 years at risk of STIs through reporting of condom use errors (ie, breakage or slippage) or condomless penile-vaginal or penile-anal intercourse with casual or new sexual partners during the previous 3 months. Prospective participants will be recruited through targeted advertisements and an opportunistic direct approach at selected sexual health and genitourinary medicine services and university-associated health centers and general practitioner practices. Community and educational establishments will be used to further advertise the study and signpost men to recruitment sites. Participants will be randomly allocated to 1 of 3 trial arms. A repeated measures design will assess the parallel arms with baseline and 12 monthly follow-up questionnaires after intervention and 3 chlamydia screening points (baseline, 6, and 12 months).

resultsRecruitment commenced in March 2020. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the study was halted and has since reopened for recruitment in Summer 2021. A 30-month recruitment period is planned.

conclusionsIf effective and cost-effective, HIS-UK can be scaled up into routine NHS usual care to reduce both STI transmission in young people and pressure on NHS resources. This intervention may further encourage sexual health services to adopt digital technologies, allowing for them to become more widely available to young people while decreasing health inequalities and fear of stigmatization.

trial registrationISRCTN Registry ISRCTN11400820; https://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN11400820.

Indexed as

behavior interventionchlamydiacondom fit and feelcondom usedigital interventionhealth psychologypleasurerandomized controlled trialsexual behaviorsexual health

Identifiers

PMID35947422
PMCPMC9403823
OpenAlexW4285320311

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.