SynthesisJAMA network open2022
Overall Survival Benefits of Cancer Drugs Approved in China From 2005 to 2020.
Synthesis in JAMA network open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
36 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cancer burden and control in China: landscape, trends and challenges.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2026Review
- Design Characteristics and Survival Outcomes of Local Trials Supporting the Approval of Targeted Anticancer Drugs in China.Cancer medicine · 2026Article
- Accelerating cancer therapy review: a cross-sectional analysis of expedited approval in China, 2005-2021.BMC cancer · 2026Article
- Beyond Indication Expansion: Aligning Evidence, Reimbursement, and Access in Multi-Indication Oncology Drugs [Letter].Drug design, development and therapy · 2026Article
- Regulatory approval, reimbursement and postmarketing evidence of class 1 novel drugs in China, 2018-2023: an observational study.BMJ public health · 2026Article
- Comparison of the conditional approvals for anticancer drugs supported by single-arm trials in China and the United States: clinical evidence, post-marketing requirements, and regulatory outcomes.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
- Association of haematological cancer drugs recommendation levels in Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology guideline with different approval approaches: a cross-sectional study.BMJ public health · 2026Article
- What is the role of common sense oncology in the Western Pacific?The Lancet regional health. Western Pacific · 2025Review
- Current landscape of innovative drug development and regulatory support in China.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2025Review
- Comparative analysis of patients' characteristics, treatment, and survival outcomes in CLL from China and the United States.The oncologist · 2025Article
- How was published evidence used in model-based cost - utility analysis for lung cancer?Health economics review · 2025Article
- Benefit of standard systemic treatments of solid tumours in Australia varies by indication, tumour stream, and treatment modality.ESMO real world data and digital oncology · 2025Article
- Evaluation of changes in price, volume and expenditure of PD-1 drugs following the government reimbursement negotiation in China: a multiple-treatment period interrupted time series analysis.Journal of global health · 2025Article
- Preferences for public health insurance coverage of new anticancer drugs: a discrete choice experiment among non-small cell lung cancer patients in China.BMC public health · 2025Article
- Comparative Assessment of Pivotal Trials Supporting the Indication Approvals of Innovative and Modified New Anticancer Drugs in China, 2016-2022.Health data science · 2025Article
- Research and Development of Medical Countermeasures for Emerging Infectious Diseases, China, 1990-2022.Emerging infectious diseases · 2025Article
- Progress and challenges of confirmatory trials for cancer drugs granted conditional approval in China.The Lancet regional health. Western Pacific · 2024Article
- Impact of competition on reimbursement decisions for cancer drugs in China: an observational study.The Lancet regional health. Western Pacific · 2024Article
- Improvements in the health-related quality-of-life benefit of cancer drugs approved in China, 2005-2020: an observational study.The Lancet regional health. Western Pacific · 2024Article
- Cancer drug indication approvals in China and the United States: a comparison of approval times and clinical benefit, 2001-2020.The Lancet regional health. Western Pacific · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Of approximately 9 million patients with cancer in China in 2020, more than half were diagnosed with late-stage cancers. Recent regulatory reforms in China have focused on improving the availability of new cancer drugs. However, evidence on the clinical benefits of new cancer therapies authorized in China is not available. Objective: To characterize the clinical benefits of cancer drugs approved in China, as defined by the availability and magnitude of statistically significant overall survival (OS) results. Design, Setting, and Participants: This mixed-methods study comprising a systematic review and cross-sectional analysis identified antineoplastic agents approved in China between January 1, 2005, and December 31, 2020, using publicly available data and regulatory review documents issued by the National Medical Products Administration. The literature published up to June 30, 2021, was reviewed to collect results on end points used in pivotal trials supporting cancer drug approvals. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome measure was a documented statistically significant positive OS difference between a new cancer therapy and a comparator treatment. Secondary outcome measures were the magnitude of OS benefit and other primary efficacy measures in pivotal trials. Results: Between 2005 and 2020, 78 cancer drugs corresponding to 141 indications were authorized in China, including 20 drugs (25.6%) (for 30 indications) approved in China only. Of all indications, 26 (18.4%) were evaluated in single-arm or dose-optimization trials, most of which were authorized after 2017. By June 30, 2021, 34 drug indications (24.1%) had a documented lack of OS gain. For 68 indications (48.2%) that had documented evidence of OS benefit, the median magnitude of OS improvement was 4.1 (range, 1.0-35.0) months. After a median follow-up of 1.9 (range, 1.0-11.1) years from approval, OS data for 13 indications (9.2%) were either not reported or were still not mature. Fewer than one-third of cancer drug indications approved in China only had documented evidence of OS benefits (9 of 30 [30.0%]), whereas more than one-half of the cancer drug indications also available in the US or Europe had OS benefits (59 of 111 [53.1%]). Conclusions and Relevance: In this study, almost half of cancer drug indications approved in China had demonstrated OS gain. With the increase of cancer drug approvals based on single-arm trials or immature survival data in recent years, these findings highlight the need to routinely monitor the clinical benefits of new cancer therapies in China.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.