Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35947382›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2022

Analysis of Select Dietary Supplement Products Marketed to Support or Boost the Immune System.

Cindy Crawford, Bharathi Avula, Andrea T Lindsey, Abraham Walter, Kumar Katragunta, Ikhlas A Khan, Patricia A Deuster

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Quantitative Analysis of the Vitamin DPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Efficacy of a standardized extract (HemoHIM G) fromFood science and biotechnology · 2025
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Cindy CrawfordConsortium for Health and Military Performance, Department of Military and Emergency Medicine, F. Edward Hebert School of Medicine, Uniformed Services University, Bethesda, Maryland.
Bharathi AvulaNational Center for Natural Products Research, School of Pharmacy, University of Mississippi, University.
Andrea T LindseyConsortium for Health and Military Performance, Department of Military and Emergency Medicine, F. Edward Hebert School of Medicine, Uniformed Services University, Bethesda, Maryland.
Abraham WalterConsortium for Health and Military Performance, Department of Military and Emergency Medicine, F. Edward Hebert School of Medicine, Uniformed Services University, Bethesda, Maryland.
Kumar KatraguntaNational Center for Natural Products Research, School of Pharmacy, University of Mississippi, University.
Ikhlas A KhanNational Center for Natural Products Research, School of Pharmacy, University of Mississippi, University.
Patricia A DeusterConsortium for Health and Military Performance, Department of Military and Emergency Medicine, F. Edward Hebert School of Medicine, Uniformed Services University, Bethesda, Maryland.
University of Mississippi · USHenry M. Jackson Foundation · USUniformed Services University of the Health Sciences · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Cold, flu, and immunity dietary supplement product sales have skyrocketed since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic. Supporting or boosting the immune system has become an important reason for using dietary supplements, and many consumers are purchasing products through online platforms. Objectives: To examine whether select dietary supplement products advertised as supporting or boosting the immune system are accurately labeled according to the Supplement Facts label of listed ingredients and to qualitatively describe the product labels' characteristics in terms of claims made. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this case series, 30 featured immune health dietary supplements were selected and purchased from Amazon.com in May 2021. Product analysis was performed using liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. The list of ingredients detected through analysis for each product was compared with the ingredients on the product's Supplement Facts label to determine whether the product's label was accurate. Claims made on product labels were also evaluated by using the Operation Supplement Safety Scorecard's set of questions to describe the labels' characteristics. Results: A total of 30 select dietary supplement products were evaluated. Thirteen of the 30 products had accurate labels based on the product analysis. Of the 17 products with inaccurate labels, 13 had ingredients listed on the labels that were not detected through analysis, such that their labels were misbranded. Nine products had substances detected that were not claimed on the product labels, some of which may be considered adulterated. Five were misbranded and contained additional components not claimed on the label. No product had third-party certification seals present on the packaging. Ten of the 13 products with accurate labels received a score of 4 or more when applying the Operation Supplement Safety Scorecard, meaning the product was "likely okay/less risky." Conclusions and Relevance: In this case series study, most of the products tested had inaccurate labels and claims that were inconsistent with requirements the US Food and Drug Administration has put forward for dietary supplements. Quality control measures seem to be insufficient for most of these select products, and claims made on labels may be misleading consumers who purchase products.

Indexed as

COVID-19PandemicsDietary SupplementsHumansImmune SystemUnited StatesUnited States Food and Drug Administration

Identifiers

PMID35947382
PMCPMC9366544
OpenAlexW4293496876

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.