Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35947336›Full record

ReviewCurrent reviews in musculoskeletal medicine2022

Review of Meniscus Anatomy and Biomechanics.

Enzo S Mameri, Suhas P Dasari, Luc M Fortier, Fernando Gómez Verdejo, Safa Gursoy, Adam B Yanke, Jorge Chahla

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 88 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
88citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
24.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

88 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 133 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Meniscal extrusion: Multiple theories, one clinical challenge.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2026
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Risk Factors for Failure of Meniscal Repair.Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine · 2026
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

28 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Enzo S MameriDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, 1611 W Harrison St., Chicago, IL, 60612, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9642-4868
Suhas P DasariDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, 1611 W Harrison St., Chicago, IL, 60612, USA.
Luc M FortierDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, 1611 W Harrison St., Chicago, IL, 60612, USA.
Fernando Gómez VerdejoDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, 1611 W Harrison St., Chicago, IL, 60612, USA.
Safa GursoyDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, 1611 W Harrison St., Chicago, IL, 60612, USA.
Adam B YankeDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, 1611 W Harrison St., Chicago, IL, 60612, USA.
Jorge ChahlaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, 1611 W Harrison St., Chicago, IL, 60612, USA. jachahla@msn.com.
Rush University Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewAnatomic repair of meniscal pathology is critical for restoring native joint biomechanics and kinematics for patients who suffer from meniscal tears. The purpose of this review was to summarize the pertinent anatomy, biomechanics, and kinematics of the meniscus to guide surgeons during meniscal repair procedures. RECENT

findingsOver the past decade, there has been a growing trend to save the meniscus whenever possible. The goal of repair should be to recreate native anatomy as close as possible to recapitulate normal mechanics. Studies describing the quantitative and qualitative relationship of the meniscus roots, ligaments, and attachments are key in guiding any meniscus repair. This review summarizes these relationships, with particular emphasis on meniscal roots and other key attachments to the meniscus. The composition, embryology, vascularization, biomechanics, in vivo kinetics, and in vivo kinematics of the meniscus are also discussed in this review. Meniscal tears can cause profound functional, biomechanical, and kinematic derangements within the knee joint leading to accelerated degeneration of the articular cartilage. A strong understanding of the quantitative and qualitative relationships of the meniscus and its attachments with key arthroscopic landmarks will allow a surgeon to anatomically repair meniscal pathology in order to restore native joint biomechanics.

Indexed as

AnatomyKneeMeniscus

Identifiers

PMID35947336
PMCPMC9463428
OpenAlexW4292661259

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.