Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35947308›Full record

ArticleDigestive diseases and sciences2023

Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Antegrade Stent Placement in Patients with Failed ERCP as a Modality of Preoperative and Palliative Biliary Drainage.

Sridhar Sundaram, Kiran Mane, Prachi Patil, Raosaheb Rathod, Aadish Kumar Jain, Unique Tyagi, Shaesta Mehta

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Digestive diseases and sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sridhar SundaramDepartment of Digestive Diseases and Clinical Nutrition, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India. drsridharsundaram@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2946-8534
Kiran ManeDepartment of Digestive Diseases and Clinical Nutrition, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India.
Prachi PatilDepartment of Digestive Diseases and Clinical Nutrition, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India.
Raosaheb RathodDepartment of Digestive Diseases and Clinical Nutrition, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India.
Aadish Kumar JainDepartment of Digestive Diseases and Clinical Nutrition, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India.
Unique TyagiDepartment of Digestive Diseases and Clinical Nutrition, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India.
Shaesta MehtaDepartment of Digestive Diseases and Clinical Nutrition, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India.
Homi Bhabha National Institute · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNo large studies have addressed the role of endoscopic-ultrasound biliary drainage (EUS-BD) as preoperative biliary drainage (PBD) for malignant extrahepatic biliary obstruction (MEBO). We aimed to discuss the outcomes of EUS antegrade stent placement (EUS-AG) in the preoperative and palliative setting.

methodsRetrospective review of patients who underwent EUS-AG for MEBO between December 2019 and December 2021 was done. Primary outcome measures were technical success and clinical success. Secondary outcome measures were number of days of hospitalization postprocedure, adverse events related to EUS-AG procedure, morbidity related to surgery, and 3-month mortality after surgery.

results54 patients underwent attempt for EUS-AG (mean age 54.8 ± 12.1 years; female 44.4%). Most common primary cancer was pancreatic cancer in 42.1% (23/54) patients. Indication was palliative in 34 (62.9%) patients and PBD in 20 (37%) patients. Level of block was distal in 35 (64.8%) and proximal in 19 (35.1%) patients. Technical success of EUS-AG was 88.7% (47/53). Clinical success was seen in 95.7% (45/47) patients. Median number of days of hospitalization postprocedure was 1 day. No procedure-related severe adverse events were seen. Of 20 patients who underwent EUS-AG as PBD, 19 had technical success (95%) with clinical success in 94.5% (18/19). Surgery was performed in 11 patients, of whom 10 patients underwent successful PPPD (one intraoperative liver metastasis). Two patients had Clavein-Dindo III/IV complication post-PPPD, with one mortality within 30 days of surgery.

conclusionEUS-AG is safe and effective after failed ERCP in both preoperative and palliative setting.

Indexed as

CholestasisPancreatic NeoplasmsAdultAgedCholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic RetrogradeDrainageEndosonographyFemaleHumansMiddle AgedStentsTreatment OutcomeUltrasonography, InterventionalEUS antegrade stent placementEUS biliary drainageOutcomesPreoperative biliary drainageStents

Identifiers

PMID35947308
OpenAlexW4297826889

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.