Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35947255›Full record

ArticleInterdisciplinary sciences, computational life sciences2022

BoT-Net: a lightweight bag of tricks-based neural network for efficient LncRNA-miRNA interaction prediction.

Muhammad Nabeel Asim, Muhammad Ali Ibrahim, Christoph Zehe, Johan Trygg, Andreas Dengel, Sheraz Ahmed

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Interdisciplinary sciences, computational life sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Muhammad Nabeel AsimDepartment of Computer Science, Technical University of Kaiserslautern, 67663, Kaiserslautern, Rhineland-Palatinate, Germany. Muhammad_Nabeel.Asim@dfki.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5507-198X
Muhammad Ali IbrahimDepartment of Computer Science, Technical University of Kaiserslautern, 67663, Kaiserslautern, Rhineland-Palatinate, Germany.
Christoph ZeheSartorius Stedim Cellca GmbH, 88471, Laupheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany.
Johan TryggSartorius Stedim Cellca GmbH, 88471, Laupheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany.
Andreas DengelDepartment of Computer Science, Technical University of Kaiserslautern, 67663, Kaiserslautern, Rhineland-Palatinate, Germany.
Sheraz AhmedGerman Research Center for Artificial Intelligence GmbH, 67663, Kaiserslautern, Rhineland-Palatinate, Germany.
University of Kaiserslautern · DESartorius (Germany) · DEGerman Research Centre for Artificial Intelligence · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectiveInteractions of long non-coding ribonucleic acids (lncRNAs) with micro-ribonucleic acids (miRNAs) play an essential role in gene regulation, cellular metabolic, and pathological processes. Existing purely sequence based computational approaches lack robustness and efficiency mainly due to the high length variability of lncRNA sequences. Hence, the prime focus of the current study is to find optimal length trade-offs between highly flexible length lncRNA sequences.

methodThe paper at hand performs in-depth exploration of diverse copy padding, sequence truncation approaches, and presents a novel idea of utilizing only subregions of lncRNA sequences to generate fixed-length lncRNA sequences. Furthermore, it presents a novel bag of tricks-based deep learning approach "Bot-Net" which leverages a single layer long-short-term memory network regularized through DropConnect to capture higher order residue dependencies, pooling to retain most salient features, normalization to prevent exploding and vanishing gradient issues, learning rate decay, and dropout to regularize precise neural network for lncRNA-miRNA interaction prediction.

resultsBoT-Net outperforms the state-of-the-art lncRNA-miRNA interaction prediction approach by 2%, 8%, and 4% in terms of accuracy, specificity, and matthews correlation coefficient. Furthermore, a case study analysis indicates that BoT-Net also outperforms state-of-the-art lncRNA-protein interaction predictor on a benchmark dataset by accuracy of 10%, sensitivity of 19%, specificity of 6%, precision of 14%, and matthews correlation coefficient of 26%.

conclusionIn the benchmark lncRNA-miRNA interaction prediction dataset, the length of the lncRNA sequence varies from 213 residues to 22,743 residues and in the benchmark lncRNA-protein interaction prediction dataset, lncRNA sequences vary from 15 residues to 1504 residues. For such highly flexible length sequences, fixed length generation using copy padding introduces a significant level of bias which makes a large number of lncRNA sequences very much identical to each other and eventually derail classifier generalizeability. Empirical evaluation reveals that within 50 residues of only the starting region of long lncRNA sequences, a highly informative distribution for lncRNA-miRNA interaction prediction is contained, a crucial finding exploited by the proposed BoT-Net approach to optimize the lncRNA fixed length generation process. AVAILABILITY: BoT-Net web server can be accessed at https://sds_genetic_analysis.opendfki.de/lncmiRNA/.

Indexed as

MicroRNAsRNA, Long NoncodingComputational BiologyGene Expression RegulationNeural Networks, ComputerMicroRNAsRNA, Long NoncodingBag of tricksDeep learningDeep learning strategiesLightweight neural networklncRNA–miRNA interaction predictionLong non-coding RNAMicro-RNARobust interaction predictor

Identifiers

PMID35947255
PMCPMC9581873
OpenAlexW4292075180

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.