ArticleInternational ophthalmology2022
Analysis of pupil size by repeat dilation at shrinkage stage.
Article in International ophthalmology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- The diagnostic significance of pupillary reflex pathways: insights from classical examination and advanced pupillometry.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo compare the pupil size of the original mydriasis and repeat mydriasis at the pupil shrinkage stage.
methodsRandomized prospective study. In total, 60 eyes of 30 patients aged 50-70 with age-related cataracts were included. Pupil sizes were measured by the Sirius system before mydriasis, after the first batch of mydriasis, and after the second batch of mydriasis which was 5 h later. Statistical analysis was performed using MedCalc statistical software version 20.0.3
resultsThe pupil size of the second batch of mydriasis 5 h later was smaller than the first batch of mydriasis (3.94 ± 0.88 mm vs 5.12 ± 0.96 mm, P < 0.0001).
conclusionsLess efficiency repeat mydriasis several hours later compared with original mydriasis in our study suggests that preparation of mydriasis at an appropriate time is necessary for ophthalmological operations. The effect of repeat mydriasis again by tropicamide at the shrinkage stage still needs to be explored.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.