Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35946855›Full record

ArticleJournal of applied clinical medical physics2022

3D in vivo dosimetry of HDR gynecological brachytherapy using micro silica bead TLDs.

Ramin Jaberi, Somayyeh Babaloui, Zahra Siavashpour, Maryam Moshtaghi, Alireza Shirazi, Musa Joya, Mohammad Hadi Gholami, Shakardokht Jafari

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of applied clinical medical physics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. The clinical application of in vivo dosimetry for gynaecological brachytherapy: A scoping review.Technical innovations & patient support in radiation oncology · 2025
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Journal of medical physics
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Ramin JaberiRadiation Oncology Department, Yas Hospital Complex, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Somayyeh BabalouiDepartment of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Zahra SiavashpourRadiotherapy Oncology Department, Shohada-e-Tajrish Educational Hospital, Medical School, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Maryam MoshtaghiRadiation Oncology Department, Yas Hospital Complex, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Alireza ShiraziDepartment of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Musa JoyaDepartment of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Mohammad Hadi GholamiDepartment of Medical Radiation Engineering, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
Shakardokht JafariDepartment of Physics, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK.
Tehran University of Medical Sciences · IRIran University of Medical Sciences · IRIslamic Azad University, Science and Research Branch · IRKabul Medical University · AFKabul University · AFShahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of defining an in vivo dosimetry (IVD) protocol as a patient-specific quality assurance (PSQA) using the bead thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs) for point and 3D IVD during brachytherapy (BT) of gynecological (GYN) cancer using

methodsThe 3D in vivo absorbed dose verification within the rectum and bladder as organs-at-risk was performed by bead TLDs for 30 GYN cancer patients. For rectal wall dosimetry, 80 TLDs were placed in axial arrangements around a rectal tube covered with a layer of gel. Ten beads were placed inside the Foley catheter to get the bladder-absorbed dose. Beads TLDs were localized and defined as control points in the treatment planning system (TPS) using CT images of the patients. Patients were planned and treated using the routine BT protocol. The experimentally obtained absorbed dose map of the rectal wall and the point dose of the bladder were compared to the TPSs predicted absorbed dose at these control points.

resultsRelative difference between TPS and TLDs results were -8.3% ± 19.5% and -7.2% ± 14.6% (1SD) for rectum- and bladder-absorbed dose, respectively. Gamma analysis was used to compare the calculated with the measured absorbed dose maps. Mean gamma passing rates of 84.1%, 90.8%, and 92.5% using the criteria of 3%/2 mm, 3%/3 mm, and 4%/2 mm were obtained, respectively. Eventually, a "considering level" of at least 85% as pass rate with 4%/2-mm criteria was recommended.

conclusionsA 3D IVD protocol employing bead TLDs was presented to measure absorbed doses delivered to the rectum and bladder during GYN HDR-BT as a reliable PSQA method. 3D rectal absorbed dose measurements were performed. Differences between experimentally measured and planned absorbed dose maps were presented in the form of a gamma index, which may be used as a warning for corrective action.

Indexed as

BrachytherapyIn Vivo DosimetryCobalt RadioisotopesHumansRadiation DosimetersRadiometryRadiotherapy DosageSilicon DioxideThermoluminescent DosimetryCobalt-60Cobalt RadioisotopesSilicon Dioxide3D in vivo dosimetryGYNHDR brachytherapymicro silica bead TLD

Identifiers

PMID35946855
PMCPMC9512342
OpenAlexW4292661320

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.