Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35946705›Full record

ArticleArquivos de neuro-psiquiatria2022

Diagnostic accuracy of CompCog: reaction time as a screening measure for mild cognitive impairment.

Larissa Hartle, Marina Martorelli, Giulia Balboni, Raquel Souza, Helenice Charchat-Fichman

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. A Perspective: Challenges in Dementia Research.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Larissa HartlePontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro, Departamento de Psicologia, Rio de Janeiro RJ, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-1486-8698
Marina MartorelliPontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro, Departamento de Psicologia, Rio de Janeiro RJ, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-3919-6453
Giulia BalboniUniversità degli Studi di Perugia, Dipartimento di Filosofia, scienze sociali, umane e della formazione, Perugia, Italia.ORCID 0000-0002-3596-9255
Raquel SouzaPontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro, Departamento de Psicologia, Rio de Janeiro RJ, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-3908-6011
Helenice Charchat-FichmanPontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro, Departamento de Psicologia, Rio de Janeiro RJ, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-3797-2105
Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro · BRUniversity of Perugia · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundReaction time is affected under different neurological conditions but has not been much investigated considering all types of mild cognitive impairment (MCI).

objectiveThis study investigated the diagnostic accuracy of CompCog, a computerized cognitive screening battery focusing on reaction time measurements.

methodsA sample of 52 older adults underwent neuropsychological assessments, including CompCog, and medical appointments, to be classified as a control group or be diagnosed with MCI. The accuracy of CompCog for distinguishing between the two groups was calculated.

resultsThe results from diagnostic accuracy analyses showed that the AUCs of ROC curves were as high as 0.915 (CI 0.837-0.993). The subtest with the highest sensitivity and specificity (choice reaction time subtest) had 91.7% sensitivity and 89.3% specificity. The logistic regression final model correctly classified 92.3% of individuals, with 92.9% specificity and 91.7% sensitivity, and included only four variables from different subtests.

conclusionsIn summary, the study showed that reaction time assessed through CompCog is a good screening measure to differentiate between normal aging and MCI. Reaction time measurements in milliseconds were more accurate than correct answers. This test can form part of routine clinical tests to achieve the objectives of screening for MCI, indicating further procedures for investigation and diagnosis and planning interventions.

Indexed as

Cognitive DysfunctionAgedHumansMass ScreeningNeuropsychological TestsReaction TimeSensitivity and Specificity

Identifiers

PMID35946705
PMCPMC9387195
OpenAlexW4290719080

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.