Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35946655›Full record

ArticleRevista Brasileira de terapia intensiva

Rotating nasal masks with nasal prongs reduces the incidence of moderate to severe nasal injury in preterm infants supported by noninvasive ventilation.

Paulo André Freire Magalhães, Ana Carolina Gusmão D'Amorim, Elis Fernanda Araújo Lima de Oliveira, Maria Evelyne Albuquerque Ramos, Ana Patrícia Duarte de Aquino Mendes, Juliana Fernandes de Souza Barbosa, Cyda Maria Albuquerque Reinaux

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Revista Brasileira de terapia intensiva. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 42% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Paulo André Freire MagalhãesPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Reabilitação e Desempenho Funcional, Grupo de Pesquisa em Fisioterapia Neonatal e Pediátrica, Universidade de Pernambuco - Petrolina (PE), Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2224-9291
Ana Carolina Gusmão D'AmorimReal Hospital Português de Beneficência em Pernambuco - Recife (PE), Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7627-3230
Elis Fernanda Araújo Lima de OliveiraPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Reabilitação e Desempenho Funcional, Grupo de Pesquisa em Fisioterapia Neonatal e Pediátrica, Universidade de Pernambuco - Petrolina (PE), Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7049-4232
Maria Evelyne Albuquerque RamosReal Hospital Português de Beneficência em Pernambuco - Recife (PE), Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7398-0204
Ana Patrícia Duarte de Aquino MendesReal Hospital Português de Beneficência em Pernambuco - Recife (PE), Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9487-6078
Juliana Fernandes de Souza BarbosaDepartamento de Fisioterapia, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco - Recife (PE), Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7509-8853
Cyda Maria Albuquerque ReinauxDepartamento de Fisioterapia, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco - Recife (PE), Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2059-7778
Weatherford College · USBrazilian Agricultural Research Corporation · BRUniversidade Federal de Pernambuco · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo investigate the association between noninvasive ventilation delivery devices and the incidence of nasal septum injury in preterm infants.

methodsThis retrospective singlecenter cohort study included preterm infants supported by noninvasive ventilation. The incidence of nasal injury was compared among three groups according to the noninvasive ventilation delivery device (G1 - nasal mask; G2 - binasal prongs; and G3, rotation of nasal mask with prongs). Nasal injury was classified according to the National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel as stages 1 - 4. Multivariate regression analyses were performed to estimate relative risks to identify possible predictors associated with medical device-related injuries.

resultsAmong the 300 infants included in the study, the incidence of medical device-related injuries in the rotating group was significantly lower than that in the continuous mask or prong groups (n = 68; 40.48%; p value < 0.01).The basal prong group presented more stage 2 injuries (n = 15; 55.56%; p < 0.01). Staying ≥ 7 days in noninvasive ventilation was associated with a higher frequency of medical device-related injuries, regardless of device (63.81%; p < 0.01). Daily increments in noninvasive ventilation increased the risk for nasal injury by 4% (95%CI 1.02 - 1.06; p < 0.01). Higher birth weight indicated protection against medical device-related injuries. Each gained gram represented a decrease of 1% in the risk of developing nasal septum injury (RR: 0.99; 95%CI 0.99 - 0.99; p < 0.04).

conclusionRotating nasal masks with nasal prongs reduces the incidence of moderate to severe nasal injury in comparison with single devices. The addition of days using noninvasive ventilation seems to contribute to medical device-related injuries, and higher birth weight is a protective factor.

Indexed as

Nasal CavityNoninvasive VentilationBirth WeightHumansIncidenceInfant, NewbornInfant, PrematureMasksRetrospective StudiesWounds and Injuries

Identifiers

PMID35946655
PMCPMC9354102
OpenAlexW4289646758

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.