Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35946631›Full record

ArticleRevista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical2022

Prediction of malaria using deep learning models: A case study on city clusters in the state of Amazonas, Brazil, from 2003 to 2018.

Matheus Félix Xavier Barboza, Kayo Henrique de Carvalho Monteiro, Iago Richard Rodrigues, Guto Leoni Santos, Wuelton Marcelo Monteiro, Elder Augusto Guimaraes Figueira, Vanderson de Souza Sampaio, Theo Lynn, Patricia Takako Endo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Matheus Félix Xavier BarbozaUniversidade de Pernambuco, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Engenharia da Computação, Recife, PE, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0912-7705
Kayo Henrique de Carvalho MonteiroUniversidade de Pernambuco, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Engenharia da Computação, Recife, PE, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7153-9906
Iago Richard RodriguesUniversidade Federal de Pernambuco, Centro de Informática, Recife, PE, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8242-9059
Guto Leoni SantosUniversidade Federal de Pernambuco, Centro de Informática, Recife, PE, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0257-4214
Wuelton Marcelo MonteiroUniversidade do Estado do Amazonas, Manaus, AM, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0848-1940
Elder Augusto Guimaraes FigueiraFundação de Vigilância em Saúde Rosemary Costa Pinto, Manaus, AM, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5512-3786
Vanderson de Souza SampaioFundação de Medicina Tropical Doutor Heitor Vieira Dourado, Manaus, AM, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7307-8851
Theo LynnDublin City University, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9284-7580
Patricia Takako EndoUniversidade de Pernambuco, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Engenharia da Computação, Recife, PE, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9163-5583

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMalaria is curable. Nonetheless, over 229 million cases of malaria were recorded in 2019, along with 409,000 deaths. Although over 42 million Brazilians are at risk of contracting malaria, 99% percent of all malaria cases in Brazil are located in or around the Amazon rainforest. Despite declining cases and deaths, malaria remains a major public health issue in Brazil. Accurate spatiotemporal prediction of malaria propagation may enable improved resource allocation to support efforts to eradicate the disease.

methodsIn response to calls for novel research on malaria elimination strategies that suit local conditions, in this study, we propose machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) models to predict the probability of malaria cases in the state of Amazonas. Using a dataset of approximately 6 million records (January 2003 to December 2018), we applied k-means clustering to group cities based on their similarity of malaria incidence. We evaluated random forest, long-short term memory (LSTM) and dated recurrent unit (GRU) models and compared their performance.

resultsThe LSTM architecture achieved better performance in clusters with less variability in the number of cases, whereas the GRU presents better results in clusters with high variability. Although Diebold-Mariano testing suggested that both the LSTM and GRU performed comparably, GRU can be trained significantly faster, which could prove advantageous in practice.

conclusionsAll models showed satisfactory accuracy and strong performance in predicting new cases of malaria, and each could serve as a supplemental tool to support regional policies and strategies.

Indexed as

Deep LearningMalariaBrazilCitiesHumansIncidence

Identifiers

PMID35946631
PMCPMC9344950

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.