Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35946576›Full record

ArticleGenetics2022

Cytological heterogeneity of heterochromatin among 10 sequenced Drosophila species.

Marcella Marchetti, Lucia Piacentini, Maria Francesca Berloco, Assunta Maria Casale, Ugo Cappucci, Sergio Pimpinelli, Laura Fanti

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. TheCells · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Marcella MarchettiIstituto Pasteur Italia and Dipartimento di Biologia e Biotecnologie "Charles Darwin", "Sapienza" University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5431-5161
Lucia PiacentiniIstituto Pasteur Italia and Dipartimento di Biologia e Biotecnologie "Charles Darwin", "Sapienza" University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3656-5068
Maria Francesca BerlocoDipartimento di Biologia, Università degli Studi di Bari "Aldo Moro", 70121 Bari, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3826-8427
Assunta Maria CasaleIstituto Pasteur Italia and Dipartimento di Biologia e Biotecnologie "Charles Darwin", "Sapienza" University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7025-7368
Ugo CappucciIstituto Pasteur Italia and Dipartimento di Biologia e Biotecnologie "Charles Darwin", "Sapienza" University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5862-1390
Sergio PimpinelliIstituto Pasteur Italia and Dipartimento di Biologia e Biotecnologie "Charles Darwin", "Sapienza" University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-0838-9391
Laura FantiIstituto Pasteur Italia and Dipartimento di Biologia e Biotecnologie "Charles Darwin", "Sapienza" University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-4380-997X
Istituto Pasteur · ITUniversity of Bari Aldo Moro · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In Drosophila chromosomal rearrangements can be maintained and are associated with karyotypic variability among populations from different geographic localities. The abundance of variability in gene arrangements among chromosomal arms is even greater when comparing more distantly related species and the study of these chromosomal changes has provided insights into the evolutionary history of species in the genus. In addition, the sequencing of genomes of several Drosophila species has offered the opportunity to establish the global pattern of genomic evolution, at both genetic and chromosomal level. The combined approaches of comparative analysis of syntenic blocks and direct physical maps on polytene chromosomes have elucidated changes in the orientation of genomic sequences and the difference between heterochromatic and euchromatic regions. Unfortunately, the centromeric heterochromatic regions cannot be studied using the cytological maps of polytene chromosomes because they are underreplicated and therefore reside in the chromocenter. In Drosophila melanogaster, a cytological map of the heterochromatin has been elaborated using mitotic chromosomes from larval neuroblasts. In the current work, we have expanded on that mapping by producing cytological maps of the mitotic heterochromatin in an additional 10 sequenced Drosophila species. These maps highlight 2 apparently different paths, for the evolution of the pericentric heterochromatin between the subgenera Sophophora and Drosophila. One path leads toward a progressive complexity of the pericentric heterochromatin (Sophophora) and the other toward a progressive simplification (Drosophila). These maps are also useful for a better understanding how karyotypes have been altered by chromosome arm reshuffling during evolution.

Indexed as

Drosophila ProteinsHeterochromatinAnimalsDrosophilaDrosophila melanogasterPolytene ChromosomesDrosophila ProteinsHeterochromatinDrosophila speciesevolutionheterochromatin

Identifiers

PMID35946576
PMCPMC9526073
OpenAlexW4296130001

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.