ArticleThe Indian journal of medical research2022
Molecular basis of RhD-negative phenotype in North Indian blood donor population.
Article in The Indian journal of medical research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Characterisation of RHD and RHCE variations in blood donors from Jazan Province, Southwestern Saudi Arabia.Transfusion medicine (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
- Molecular Background of RhD-positive and RhD-negative Phenotypes in a Saudi Population.Saudi journal of medicine & medical sciencesArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background & objectives: RHD gene typing is highly complex due to homology with RHCE genes. Molecular polymorphism of the RHCE and RHD genes have been characterized among various populations, but no studies have been undertaken among Indians. This study was undertaken to assess the genetic basis of RHD-negative phenotype in Indian blood donor population. Methods: Sample from a total of 200 phenotypically RhD-negative blood donors were analyzed for presence of RHD gene using polymerase chain reaction (PCR). RHD genotyping was done using three primer sets designed for exons 4 and 10 and one set for identification of pseudo (RHDΨ) gene between introns (int) 3 and 4. Amplified PCR products were analyzed by gel-electrophoresis (XY Loper, Uvitech, Cambridge) and confirmed by nucleotide sequencing (ABI 3730 xl 96 capillary system). Results: No PCR product was found in 195/200 (97.5%) of study samples indicating homozygous gene deletion. Of the 5/200 (2.5%) showing RHD gene polymorphisms, 4/200 (2%) were positive for presence of exon 10 only (RHD-CE-D hybrid). RHDΨ gene was not detected in any of the samples tested. One sample showed presence of all three tested regions and was negative for RHDΨ gene. Interpretation & conclusions: RHD gene deletion was found to be the most common cause of an RHD-negative phenotype while RHDΨ gene was, reported to be present in up to 39 per cent of various ethnic populations, but was not detected. RHD-CE-D hybrid gene (found in 2.5% individuals) is important for predicting the requirement of Rh prophylaxis during the antenatal period.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.