Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35946096›Full record

ReviewCurrent medicinal chemistry2023

Chemotherapy and Anticancer Drugs Adjustment in Obesity: A Narrative Review.

João Pedro Thimotheo Batista, Lucas Alexandre Santos Marzano, Renata Aguiar Menezes Silva, Karla Emília de Sá Rodrigues, Ana Cristina Simões E Silva

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current medicinal chemistry, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

João Pedro Thimotheo BatistaLaboratório Interdisciplinar de Investigação Médica (LIIM), Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG), CEP 30.130-100, Avenida Professor Alfredo Balena, nº190/sl 281, Santa Efigênia, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.
Lucas Alexandre Santos MarzanoLaboratório Interdisciplinar de Investigação Médica (LIIM), Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG), CEP 30.130-100, Avenida Professor Alfredo Balena, nº190/sl 281, Santa Efigênia, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.
Renata Aguiar Menezes SilvaLaboratório Interdisciplinar de Investigação Médica (LIIM), Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG), CEP 30.130-100, Avenida Professor Alfredo Balena, nº190/sl 281, Santa Efigênia, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.
Karla Emília de Sá RodriguesDepartmento de Pediatria, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, CEP 30.130-100, Avenida Professor Alfredo Balena, nº190/sl 281, Santa Efgênia, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.
Ana Cristina Simões E SilvaLaboratório Interdisciplinar de Investigação Médica (LIIM), Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG), CEP 30.130-100, Avenida Professor Alfredo Balena, nº190/sl 281, Santa Efigênia, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.
Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundObese individuals have higher rates of cancer incidence and cancer- related mortality. The worse chemotherapy outcomes observed in this subset of patients are multifactorial, including the altered physiology in obesity and its impact on pharmacokinetics, the possible increased risk of underdosing, and treatment-related toxicity.

aimsThe present review aimed to discuss recent data on physiology, providing just an overall perspective and pharmacokinetic alterations in obesity concerning chemotherapy. We also reviewed the controversies of dosing adjustment strategies in adult and pediatric patients, mainly addressing the use of actual total body weight and ideal body weight.

methodsThis narrative review tried to provide the best evidence to support antineoplastic drug dosing strategies in children, adolescents, and adults.

resultsCardiovascular, hepatic, and renal alterations of obesity can affect the distribution, metabolism, and clearance of drugs. Anticancer drugs have a narrow therapeutic range, and variations in dosing may result in either toxicity or underdosing. Obese patients are underrepresented in clinical trials that focus on determining recommendations for chemotherapy dosing and administration in clinical practice. After considering associated comorbidities, the guidelines recommend that chemotherapy should be dosed according to body surface area (BSA) calculated with actual total body weight, not an estimate or ideal weight, especially when the intention of therapy is the cure.

conclusionThe actual total body weight dosing appears to be a better approach to dosing anticancer drugs in both adults and children when aiming for curative results, showing no difference in toxicity and no limitation in treatment outcomes compared to adjusted doses.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsNeoplasmsAdolescentAdultBody WeightChildHumansObesityPharmaceutical PreparationsAntineoplastic AgentsPharmaceutical Preparationsactual total body weightantineoplasticsbody-surface areacancer chemotherapydose adjustmentideal body weightObesitypediatricspharmacokinetics

Identifiers

PMID35946096
OpenAlexW4292466438

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.