Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35945629›Full record

ReviewAnimal microbiome2022

A framework for testing the impact of co-infections on host gut microbiomes.

Dominik W Schmid, Gloria Fackelmann, Wasimuddin, Jacques Rakotondranary, Yedidya R Ratovonamana, B Karina Montero, Jörg U Ganzhorn, Simone Sommer

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Animal microbiome, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. ISME communications · 2025
    Article
  9. InvasiveInternational journal for parasitology. Parasites and wildlife · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Dominik W SchmidInstitute of Evolutionary Ecology and Conservation Genomics, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany. Dominikwerner.schmid@uni-ulm.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8908-3882
Gloria FackelmannInstitute of Evolutionary Ecology and Conservation Genomics, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany.
WasimuddinInstitute of Evolutionary Ecology and Conservation Genomics, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany.
Jacques RakotondranaryFaculté Des Sciences, Université d'Antananarivo, 566, Antananarivo, Madagascar.
Yedidya R RatovonamanaFaculté Des Sciences, Université d'Antananarivo, 566, Antananarivo, Madagascar.
B Karina MonteroDepartment of Animal Ecology and Conservation, Institute of Zoology, Universität Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.
Jörg U GanzhornDepartment of Animal Ecology and Conservation, Institute of Zoology, Universität Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.
Simone SommerInstitute of Evolutionary Ecology and Conservation Genomics, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany.
Universität Ulm · DEUniversität Hamburg · DEUniversity of Antananarivo · MGUniversity of Bern · CH

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft 17-1Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft 9-2Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft DFG SO428/9-1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Parasitic infections disturb gut microbial communities beyond their natural range of variation, possibly leading to dysbiosis. Yet it remains underappreciated that most infections are accompanied by one or more co-infections and their collective impact is largely unexplored. Here we developed a framework illustrating changes to the host gut microbiome following single infections, and build on it by describing the neutral, synergistic or antagonistic impacts on microbial α- and ß-diversity expected from co-infections. We tested the framework on microbiome data from a non-human primate population co-infected with helminths and Adenovirus, and matched patterns reported in published studies to the introduced framework. In this case study, α-diversity of co-infected Malagasy mouse lemurs (Microcebus griseorufus) did not differ in comparison with that of singly infected or uninfected individuals, even though community composition captured with ß-diversity metrices changed significantly. Explicitly, we record stochastic changes in dispersion, a sign of dysbiosis, following the Anna-Karenina principle rather than deterministic shifts in the microbial gut community. From the literature review and our case study, neutral and synergistic impacts emerged as common outcomes from co-infections, wherein both shifts and dispersion of microbial communities following co-infections were often more severe than after a single infection alone, but microbial α-diversity was not universally altered. Important functions of the microbiome may also suffer from such heavily altered, though no less species-rich microbial community. Lastly, we pose the hypothesis that the reshuffling of host-associated microbial communities due to the impact of various, often coinciding parasitic infections may become a source of novel or zoonotic diseases.

Indexed as

Co-infectionsDisease ecologyDysbiosisGut microbiomeHelminthsNon-human primateOne healthParasitesVirusWildlife health

Identifiers

PMID35945629
PMCPMC9361228
OpenAlexW4291284473

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.