Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35945623›Full record

ArticleGenome biology2022

Single-cell diploid Hi-C reveals the role of spatial aggregations in complex rearrangements and KMT2A fusions in leukemia.

Zhihao Xing, Huirong Mai, Xiaorong Liu, Xiaoying Fu, Xingliang Zhang, Lichun Xie, Yunsheng Chen, Adam Shlien, Feiqiu Wen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 41% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Spatial-Temporal Genome Regulation in Stress-Response and Cell-Fate Change.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Zhihao XingClinical Laboratory & Division of Hematology and Oncology, Shenzhen Children's Hospital, Shenzhen, China.
Huirong MaiDivision of Hematology and Oncology, Shenzhen Children's Hospital, Shenzhen, China.
Xiaorong LiuClinical Laboratory & Division of Hematology and Oncology, Shenzhen Children's Hospital, Shenzhen, China.
Xiaoying FuClinical Laboratory & Division of Hematology and Oncology, Shenzhen Children's Hospital, Shenzhen, China.
Xingliang ZhangShenzhen Institute of Pediatrics, Shenzhen Children's Hospital, Shenzhen, China.
Lichun XieDivision of Hematology and Oncology, Shenzhen Children's Hospital, Shenzhen, China.
Yunsheng ChenClinical Laboratory & Division of Hematology and Oncology, Shenzhen Children's Hospital, Shenzhen, China. chenyunshenglw@163.com.
Adam ShlienProgram in Genetics and Genome Biology, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada. adam.shlien@sickkids.ca.
Feiqiu WenDivision of Hematology and Oncology, Shenzhen Children's Hospital, Shenzhen, China. fwen62@163.com.ORCID 0000-0001-5559-633X
Shenzhen Children's Hospital · CNHospital for Sick Children · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSimple translocations and complex rearrangements are formed through illegitimate ligations of double-strand breaks of fusion partners and lead to generation of oncogenic fusion genes that affect cellular function. The contact first hypothesis states that fusion partners tend to colocalize prior to fusion in normal cells. Here we test this hypothesis at the single-cell level and explore the underlying mechanism.

resultsBy analyzing published single-cell diploid Hi-C datasets, we find partner genes fused in leukemia exhibit smaller spatial distances than those fused in solid tumor and control gene pairs. Intriguingly, multiple partners tend to colocalize with KMT2A in the same cell. 3D genome architecture has little association with lineage decision of KMT2A fusion types in leukemia. Besides simple translocations, complex rearrangement-related KMT2A fusion genes (CRGs) also show closer proximity and belong to a genome-wide mutual proximity network. We find CRGs are co-expressed, co-localized, and enriched in the targets of the transcriptional factor RUNX1, suggesting they may be involved in RUNX1-mediated transcription factories. Knockdown of RUNX1 leads to significantly fewer contacts among CRGs. We also find CRGs are enriched in active transcriptional regions and loop anchors, and exhibit high levels of TOP2-mediated DNA breakages. Inhibition of transcription leads to reduced DNA breakages of CRGs.

conclusionsOur results demonstrate KMT2A partners and CRGs may form dynamic and multipartite spatial clusters in individual cells that may be involved in RUNX1-mediated transcription factories, wherein massive DNA damages and illegitimate ligations of genes may occur, leading to complex rearrangements and KMT2A fusions in leukemia.

Indexed as

Core Binding Factor Alpha 2 SubunitLeukemiaDiploidyGene RearrangementHumansMyeloid-Lymphoid Leukemia ProteinOncogene Proteins, FusionTranslocation, GeneticCore Binding Factor Alpha 2 SubunitMyeloid-Lymphoid Leukemia ProteinOncogene Proteins, FusionComplex rearrangementsFusionsGenomic rearrangementsLeukemiaSingle-cell Hi-C

Identifiers

PMID35945623
PMCPMC9361544
OpenAlexW4291019397

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.