Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35945568›Full record

ArticleAlzheimer's research & therapy2022

An explainable self-attention deep neural network for detecting mild cognitive impairment using multi-input digital drawing tasks.

Natthanan Ruengchaijatuporn, Itthi Chatnuntawech, Surat Teerapittayanon, Sira Sriswasdi, Sirawaj Itthipuripat, Solaphat Hemrungrojn, Prodpran Bunyabukkana, Aisawan Petchlorlian, Sedthapong Chunamchai, Thiparat Chotibut and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Alzheimer's research & therapy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Natthanan Ruengchaijatuporn *Computational Molecular Biology Group, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, 10330, Thailand.
Itthi Chatnuntawech *National Nanotechnology Center, National Science and Technology Development Agency, Pathum Thani, 12120, Thailand.
Surat TeerapittayanonNational Nanotechnology Center, National Science and Technology Development Agency, Pathum Thani, 12120, Thailand.
Sira SriswasdiComputational Molecular Biology Group, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, 10330, Thailand.
Sirawaj ItthipuripatNeuroscience Center for Research and Innovation, Learning Institute, King Mongkut's University of Technology Thonburi, Bangkok, 10140, Thailand.
Solaphat HemrungrojnChula Neuroscience Center, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Thai Red Cross Society, Bangkok, 10330, Thailand.
Prodpran BunyabukkanaDepartment of Computer Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, 10330, Thailand.
Aisawan PetchlorlianGeriatric Excellence Center, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Thai Red Cross Society, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, 10330, Thailand.
Sedthapong ChunamchaiChula Neuroscience Center, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Thai Red Cross Society, Bangkok, 10330, Thailand.
Thiparat Chotibut *Chula Intelligent and Complex Systems Lab, Department of Physics, Faculty of Science, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, 10330, Thailand. thiparat.c@chula.ac.th.
Chaipat Chunharas *Chula Neuroscience Center, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Thai Red Cross Society, Bangkok, 10330, Thailand. chaipat.c@chula.ac.th.
Chulalongkorn University · THKing Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital · THKing Mongkut's University of Technology Thonburi · THNational Nanotechnology Center · THNational Science and Technology Development Agency · THThai Red Cross Society · TH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMild cognitive impairment (MCI) is an early stage of cognitive decline which could develop into dementia. An early detection of MCI is a crucial step for timely prevention and intervention. Recent studies have developed deep learning models to detect MCI and dementia using a bedside task like the classic clock drawing test (CDT). However, it remains a challenge to predict the early stage of the disease using the CDT data alone. Moreover, the state-of-the-art deep learning techniques still face black box challenges, making it questionable to implement them in a clinical setting.

methodsWe recruited 918 subjects from King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital (651 healthy subjects and 267 MCI patients). We propose a novel deep learning framework that incorporates data from the CDT, cube-copying, and trail-making tests. Soft label and self-attention were applied to improve the model performance and provide a visual explanation. The interpretability of the visualization of our model and the Grad-CAM approach were rated by experienced medical personnel and quantitatively evaluated using intersection over union (IoU) between the models' heat maps and the regions of interest.

resultsRather than using a single CDT image in the baseline VGG16 model, using multiple drawing tasks as inputs into our proposed model with soft label significantly improves the classification performance between the healthy aging controls and the MCI patients. In particular, the classification accuracy increases from 0.75 (baseline model) to 0.81. The F1-score increases from 0.36 to 0.65, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) increases from 0.74 to 0.84. Compared to the multi-input model that also offers interpretable visualization, i.e., Grad-CAM, our model receives higher interpretability scores given by experienced medical experts and higher IoUs.

conclusionsOur model achieves better classification performance at detecting MCI compared to the baseline model. In addition, the model provides visual explanations that are superior to those of the baseline model as quantitatively evaluated by experienced medical personnel. Thus, our work offers an interpretable machine learning model with high classification performance, both of which are crucial aspects of artificial intelligence in medical diagnosis.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseCognitive DysfunctionArtificial IntelligenceAttentionHumansNeural Networks, Computer

Identifiers

PMID35945568
PMCPMC9361513
OpenAlexW4290755265

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.