Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35945489›Full record

ArticleBMC primary care2022

Detection of primary Sjögren's syndrome in primary care: developing a classification model with the use of routine healthcare data and machine learning.

Jesper T Dros, Isabelle Bos, Frank C Bennis, Sytske Wiegersma, John Paget, Chiara Seghieri, Jaime Barrio Cortés, Robert A Verheij

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC primary care, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Diagnostic methods for managing dry eyes.World journal of methodology · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jesper T DrosNetherlands Institute for Health Services Research (NIVEL), Utrecht, the Netherlands. j.dros@nivel.nl.
Isabelle BosNetherlands Institute for Health Services Research (NIVEL), Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Frank C BennisNetherlands Institute for Health Services Research (NIVEL), Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Sytske WiegersmaNetherlands Institute for Health Services Research (NIVEL), Utrecht, the Netherlands.
John PagetNetherlands Institute for Health Services Research (NIVEL), Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Chiara SeghieriInstitute of Management, Sant 'Anna School of Advanced Studies, Pisa, Italy.
Jaime Barrio CortésFaculty of Education and Health, University Camilo José Cela, Madrid, Spain.
Robert A VerheijNetherlands Institute for Health Services Research (NIVEL), Utrecht, the Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrimary Sjögren's Syndrome (pSS) is a rare autoimmune disease that is difficult to diagnose due to a variety of clinical presentations, resulting in misdiagnosis and late referral to specialists. To improve early-stage disease recognition, this study aimed to develop an algorithm to identify possible pSS patients in primary care. We built a machine learning algorithm which was based on combined healthcare data as a first step towards a clinical decision support system.

methodRoutine healthcare data, consisting of primary care electronic health records (EHRs) data and hospital claims data (HCD), were linked on patient level and consisted of 1411 pSS and 929,179 non-pSS patients. Logistic regression (LR) and random forest (RF) models were used to classify patients using age, gender, diseases and symptoms, prescriptions and GP visits.

resultsThe LR and RF models had an AUC of 0.82 and 0.84, respectively. Many actual pSS patients were found (sensitivity LR = 72.3%, RF = 70.1%), specificity was 74.0% (LR) and 77.9% (RF) and the negative predictive value was 99.9% for both models. However, most patients classified as pSS patients did not have a diagnosis of pSS in secondary care (positive predictive value LR = 0.4%, RF = 0.5%).

conclusionThis is the first study to use machine learning to classify patients with pSS in primary care using GP EHR data. Our algorithm has the potential to support the early recognition of pSS in primary care and should be validated and optimized in clinical practice. To further enhance the algorithm in detecting pSS in primary care, we suggest it is improved by working with experienced clinicians.

Indexed as

Sjogren's SyndromeDelivery of Health CareHumansMachine LearningPredictive Value of TestsPrimary Health CareMachine learningPrimary carePrimary Sjögren’s syndromeRoutine healthcare data

Identifiers

PMID35945489
PMCPMC9361661

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.