Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35945459›Full record

ReviewOrthopadie (Heidelberg, Germany)2022

[Market overview: Robotic-assisted arthroplasty : Current robotic systems, learning curve and cost analysis].

Lars-René Tuecking, Max Ettinger, Henning Windhagen, Peter Savov

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Orthopadie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 80% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Lars-René TueckingOrthopädische Klinik der MHH im Diakovere Annastift, Anna-von-Borries-Str. 1-6, 30625, Hannover, Deutschland. lars-rene.tuecking@diakovere.de.
Max EttingerOrthopädische Klinik der MHH im Diakovere Annastift, Anna-von-Borries-Str. 1-6, 30625, Hannover, Deutschland.
Henning WindhagenOrthopädische Klinik der MHH im Diakovere Annastift, Anna-von-Borries-Str. 1-6, 30625, Hannover, Deutschland.
Peter SavovOrthopädische Klinik der MHH im Diakovere Annastift, Anna-von-Borries-Str. 1-6, 30625, Hannover, Deutschland.
Diakovere · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Robotic-assisted arthroplasty has been rapidly entering clinical routine in recent years. The leading endoprosthesis manufacturers have all meanwhile placed robotic systems on the market, which, however, differ significantly from one another technically. Current systems are currently classified according to the degree of autonomy (active vs. semi-active vs. passive) and the data/image source (image-based: CT vs. X‑ray, imageless). Some systems already offer the possibility of robotic-assisted or navigated implantation of hip endoprostheses. In the following review article, the currently leading robotic systems will be presented and compared with regard to their characteristics. Furthermore, the analysis of the learning curves for the different systems, currently available cost analysis models and an outlook on future developments and challenges will be given.

Indexed as

Arthroplasty, Replacement, HipArthroplasty, Replacement, KneeRobotic Surgical ProceduresCosts and Cost AnalysisLearning CurveComputer-assisted surgeryImage-guided surgerySurgical navigation systemsTotal hip replacementTotal knee replacement

Identifiers

PMID35945459
OpenAlexW4293685778

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.