Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35945315›Full record

ArticleArchives of microbiology2022

Biosorption of lead by a soil isolate Aspergillus neoalliaceus.

Y Doruk Aracagök

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of microbiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Y Doruk AracagökBiology Department, Faculty of Science, Hacettepe University, Beytepe, 06800, Ankara, Turkey. doruk@hacettepe.edu.tr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0354-0817
Hacettepe University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study focused on Pb (II) elimination from aqueous solutions using fungal soil isolate which is identified as Aspergillus neoalliaceus. The sorption of lead with fungal mass studies was performed as a function of pH, biomass dose, contact time, and initial dye concentration. The solution pH value strongly affected the sorption of lead fungal mass. To examine the effect of hydrogen ions on biosorption in solutions containing lead, solutions with different pH values were used and pH 5 was found to be the most suitable pH value for lead removal. Lead biosorption remained very low below pH 4 because of the competing effect of hydrogen ions in the solution. It has been observed that the removal of lead ions based on biosorption with Aspergillus neoalliaceus is better explained by Langmuir isotherm and pseudo-second-order kinetic models compared to other used models. The biosorption of Pb (II) was determined as a spontaneous and endothermic process.

Indexed as

SoilWater Pollutants, ChemicalAspergillusBiomassHydrogen-Ion ConcentrationKineticsLeadProtonsThermodynamicsLeadProtonsSoilWater Pollutants, ChemicalAspergillus neoalliaceusBiosorptionIsothermsKineticsLead

Identifiers

PMID35945315
OpenAlexW4291019700

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.