Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35944722›Full record

Trial reportThe Journal of pediatrics2022

Adolescent Suicide Risk Screening: A Secondary Analysis of the SHIELD Randomized Clinical Trial.

Deepa L Sekhar, Erich Batra, Eric W Schaefer, Leslie R Walker-Harding, Krista L Pattison, Alissa Molinari, Perri Rosen, Jennifer L Kraschnewski, James G Waxmonsky

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The Journal of pediatrics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03716869 (Randomized Controlled Trial of Universal vs. Targeted School Screening for Adolescent Major Depressive Disorder), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03716869 nacompletednot on this map

Randomized Controlled Trial of Universal vs. Targeted School Screening for Adolescent Major Depressive Disorder

TypeinterventionalSponsorMilton S. Hershey Medical CenterRan2018 to 2021Enrolled12,909ConditionsMajor Depressive Disorder, Major Depressive EpisodeArmsUniversal Screening Arm
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Deepa L SekharDepartment of Pediatrics, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, PA.
Erich BatraDepartment of Pediatrics, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, PA; Department of Family and Community Medicine, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, PA.
Eric W SchaeferDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, PA.
Leslie R Walker-HardingDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Washington/Seattle Children's, Seattle, WA.
Krista L PattisonDepartment of Pediatrics, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, PA.
Alissa MolinariDepartment of Pediatrics, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, PA.
Perri RosenStatewide Project Advisor, Garrett Lee Smith Youth Suicide Prevention Grant, Harrisburg, PA.
Jennifer L KraschnewskiDepartment of Pediatrics, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, PA; Department of Public Health Sciences, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, PA; Department of Medicine, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, PA.
James G WaxmonskyDepartment of Psychiatry, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, PA.
Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center · USPennsylvania State University · USSeattle Children's Hospital · US

Funding

Penn State Clinical and Translational Science InstituteUL1TR002014 · NCATS · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIV HERSHEY MED CTR · PI KRASCHNEWSKI, JENNIFER L. · 2016 to 2025
$33.7M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002014Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute AD-2017C3-8752
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate the effectiveness of adolescent suicide risk screening to increase initiation of mental health services via a secondary analysis using data from the SHIELD (Screening in High Schools to Identify, Evaluate and Lower Depression) randomized clinical trial, which evaluated school-based screening for major depressive disorder (MDD). STUDY

designStudents in 14 Pennsylvania high schools were randomized by grade to either the usual school practice of targeted referral for behavior raising a concern for suicide risk or universal screening using the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), with any response >0 to item 9 regarding suicide risk considered positive. Students identified in either arm were referred to the Student Assistance Program (SAP), which is mandated in all Pennsylvania schools. The SAP determined follow-up. Study groups were compared using mixed-effects logistic regression.

resultsThe participants comprised 12 909 students, with 6473 (50.1%) randomized to universal screening. The study group was 46% female and 43% Hispanic or non-Hispanic Black. Adolescents in the universal screening arm had 7.1-fold greater odds (95% CI, 5.7-8.8) of being identified as at risk for suicide, 7.8-fold greater odds (95% CI, 4.6-13.1) of follow-up needs, and 4.0-fold greater odds (95% CI, 2.0-7.9) of initiating mental health treatment.

conclusionsAlthough the PHQ-9 is a MDD screening tool, its use in universal screening increased identification and treatment initiation for adolescents at risk for suicide. This confirms the value of universal screening and suggests that a suicide-specific risk assessment would have even greater impact on treatment initiation for identified youth.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03716869.

Indexed as

Adolescent BehaviorMajor Depressive DisorderSuicideSuicide PreventionAdolescentFemaleHumansMaleMass ScreeningSchool Health ServicesSchoolsadolescent suicidemental healthschool-based screening

Identifiers

PMID35944722
PMCPMC10249009
OpenAlexW4290059182

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.