Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35944381›Full record

ArticleAddictive behaviors2022

Trial-level bias score versus mean bias score: Comparison of the reliability and external validity using dot-probe task among daily smokers.

Min-Jeong Yang, Allison M Borges, Noah N Emery, Teresa M Leyro

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Addictive behaviors, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Min-Jeong YangDepartment of Psychology, Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA; Department of Health Outcomes and Behavior, Moffitt Cancer Center, 4115 E. Fowler Ave, Tampa, FL 33617, USA. Electronic address: min-jeong.yang@moffitt.org.
Allison M BorgesDepartment of Behavioral Health, The Corporal Michael J. Crescenz VA Medical Center, 3900 Woodland Ave, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA. Electronic address: allison.borges@va.gov.
Noah N EmeryDepartment of Psychology, Colorado State University, 210 Behavioral Sciences Building, 1876, Campus Delivery, Fort Collins, CO 80523-1876, USA. Electronic address: noah.emery@colostate.edu.
Teresa M LeyroDepartment of Psychology, Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA. Electronic address: teresa.leyro@rutgers.edu.

Funding

Behavioral Oncology Education & Career DevelopmentT32CA090314 · NCI · H. LEE MOFFITT CANCER CTR & RES INST · PI Vani N Simmons, SUSAN T VADAPARAMPIL · 2019 to 2026
$2.9M
Acetyl-L-carnitine supplementation for co-occurring depression and alcohol use disorder in adolescents: A randomized placebo-controlled pilot studyR21AA029033 · NIAAA · BROWN UNIVERSITY · PI EMERY, NOAH, MIRANDA, ROBERT · 2021 to 2022
$447k
Transdiagnostic risk factors and the relative reinforcing efficacy of cigarettesF31DA043934 · NIDA · RUTGERS BIOMEDICAL/HEALTH SCIENCES-RBHS · PI BORGES, ALLISON · 2018 to 2019
$90k
NCI NIH HHS T32 CA090314NIAAA NIH HHS L30 AA027041NIAAA NIH HHS R21 AA029033NIDA NIH HHS F31 DA043934
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAttentional bias (AB) is an individual difference risk factor that represents the extent to which cigarette cues capture one's attention. AB is typically indexed by mean bias score (MBS), theoretically assuming that AB is static. However, poor reliability of MBS has threatened valid interpretation of the results on AB. Based on observed trial-by-trial temporal fluctuation and variability of attentional allocation, trial-level bias score (TLBS) has been introduced as an alternative index with evidence of better psychometric properties in various populations, as compared to MBS. However, such evidence is limited among daily smokers. The current study aimed to replicate and extend extant findings in a sample of daily smokers by hypothesizing that TLBS, as compared to MBS, would demonstrate superior reliability and external validity.

methodsForty-eight daily smokers completed self-reports, ad-libitum smoking, and a dot-probe task three times, which was comprised of 36 pairs of pictorial stimuli of cigarette and neutral cues, yielding 144 total trials.

resultsThe TLBS demonstrated superior internal (range intra class correlation [ICC] = 0.79-0.95) and test-retest reliability (range ICC = 0.64-0.88) compared to MBS (range ICC = 0.31-0.40 and 0.06-0.16, respectively). However, few significant relations between either the MBS or TLBS and measures of biobehavioral and self-report indices of smoking reinforcement were observed.

conclusionsThe current findings demonstrate that TLBS, as compared to MBS, is a more reliable measure of AB among daily smokers, while evidence of its external validity is limited.

Indexed as

Attentional BiasSmokersAttentionCuesHumansReproducibility of ResultsAttentional biasCigarette smokingExternal validityReliabilityTrial-level bias score

Identifiers

PMID35944381
PMCPMC10757633

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.