ArticleHuman reproduction (Oxford, England)2022
Markers of ovarian reserve are associated with reproductive age acceleration in granulosa cells from IVF patients.
Article in Human reproduction (Oxford, England), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Maternal biological ageing and telomere attrition across parity, pregnancy, and the postpartum period.Biogerontology · 2026Review
- DNMT/TET Imbalance and Network-Level DNA Methylation Remodeling in Ovarian Aging: Mechanistic Perspectives.Biology · 2026Review
- Multi-omics biomarkers in female fertility: from oocyte quality to endometrial receptivity and clinical translation.Biomarker research · 2026Review
- Advances in multi-omics and aging clock research for female reproductive health and aging.MedScience · 2026Review
- Association between sleep and ovarian reserve in women undergoing IVF/ICSI: a Mendelian randomization and cross-sectional study.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Observational
- The dynamics of DNA methylation, histone methylation and acetylation during oocyte aging in mammalian species and possible interventions to regulate them.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2025Review
- Integrated chemical exposome-metabolome profiling of follicular fluid and associations with fertility outcomes during assisted reproduction.Environment international · 2025Article
- Epigenetic aging and fecundability: the Norwegian Mother, Father and Child Cohort Study.Human reproduction (Oxford, England) · 2024Article
- Epigenetic age acceleration in follicular fluid and markers of ovarian response among women undergoing IVF.Human reproduction (Oxford, England) · 2024Article
- DNA methylation as a window into female reproductive aging.Epigenomics · 2024Review
- Hysteroscopic Endometrial Fundal Incision in Oocyte Recipients before Embryo Transfer May Improve Reproductive Outcomes: A Prospective Study.International journal of fertility & sterility · 2023Article
- Traffic-related air pollution and supplemental folic acid intake in relation to DNA methylation in granulosa cells.Clinical epigenetics · 2023Article
- Epigenetic clocks and female fertility timeline: A new approach to an old issue?Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
study questionIs reproductive aging in granulosa cells associated with markers of ovarian reserve? SUMMARY ANSWER: Age acceleration was associated with anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH) levels, antral follicle count (AFC), oocyte yield and maturity, and the number of successfully fertilized embryos. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: The rate of reproductive aging varies among women of the same age. DNA methylation can be used to predict epigenetic age in a variety of tissues. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: This was a cross-sectional study of 70 women at the time of oocyte retrieval. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING,
methodsThe 70 participants were recruited for this study at an academic medical center and they provided follicular fluid samples at the time of oocyte retrieval. Granulosa cells were isolated and assessed on the MethylationEPIC array. Linear regression was used to evaluate the associations between DNA methylation-based age predictions from granulosa cells and chronological age. Age acceleration was calculated as the residual of regressing DNA methylation-based age on chronological age. Linear regressions were used to determine the associations between age acceleration and markers of ovarian reserve and IVF cycle outcomes. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Participants were a mean of 36.7 ± 3.9 years old. In regards to race, 54% were white, 19% were African American and 27% were of another background. Age acceleration was normally distributed and not associated with chronological age. Age acceleration was negatively associated with AMH levels (t = -3.1, P = 0.003) and AFC (t = -4.0, P = 0.0001), such that women with a higher age acceleration had a lower ovarian reserve. Age acceleration was also negatively correlated with the total number of oocytes retrieved (t = -3.9, P = 0.0002), the number of mature oocytes (t = -3.8, P = 0.0003) and the number of fertilized oocytes or two-pronuclear oocytes (t = -2.8, P = 0.008) in the main analysis. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: This study used pooled follicular fluid, which does not allow for the investigation of individual follicles. Infertility patients may also be different from the general population, but, as we used granulosa cells, the participants had to be from an IVF population. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE
findingsThis study demonstrated that epigenetic age and age acceleration can be calculated from granulosa cells collected at the time of oocyte retrieval. GrimAge most strongly predicted chronological age, and GrimAge acceleration was associated with baseline and cycle characteristics as well as cycle outcomes, which indicates its potential clinical relevance in evaluating both oocyte quantity and quality. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): This study was supported by the National Institutes of Health (UL1TR002378) and the Building Interdisciplinary Research Careers in Women's Health Program (K12HD085850) to A.K.K. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health. The funding source had no role in any aspect of this study. J.B.S. serves as Vice Chair for the American Society for Reproductive Medicine Education Committee, is a Medical Committee Advisor for the Jewish Fertility Foundation and works with Jscreen. J.B.S. has received funding from Georgia Clinical Translational Research Alliance. H.S.H., J.B.S. and A.K.S. have received NIH funding for other projects. A.K.K., S.A.G., S.G., Q.S.K., L.J.M. and W.S. have no conflicts of interest. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: N/A.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.