Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35943870›Full record

ReviewTissue engineering. Part A2023

Machine Learning in Tissue Engineering.

Jason L Guo, Michael Januszyk, Michael T Longaker

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Tissue engineering. Part A, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Immunomodulatory Delivery Materials for Tissue Repair.Advanced healthcare materials · 2025
    Review
  13. Tendon regeneration deserves better: focused review onFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Mapping Biomaterial Complexity by Machine Learning.Tissue engineering. Part A · 2024
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jason L GuoDivision of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.
Michael JanuszykDivision of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.
Michael T LongakerDivision of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.

Funding

Mechanoresponsive Engrailed-1-negative fibroblasts activate Engrailed-1 to promote fibrosis in wound healingR01GM136659 · NIGMS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI LONGAKER, MICHAEL T · 2020 to 2023
$1.3M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM136659
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Machine learning (ML) and artificial intelligence have accelerated scientific discovery, augmented clinical practice, and deepened fundamental understanding of many biological phenomena. ML technologies have now been applied to diverse areas of tissue engineering research, including biomaterial design, scaffold fabrication, and cell/tissue modeling. Emerging ML-empowered strategies include machine-optimized polymer synthesis, predictive modeling of scaffold fabrication processes, complex analyses of structure-function relationships, and deep learning of spatialized cell phenotypes and tissue composition. The emergence of ML in tissue engineering, while relatively recent, has already enabled increasingly complex and multivariate analyses of the relationships between biological, chemical, and physical factors in driving tissue regenerative outcomes. This review highlights the novel methodologies, emerging strategies, and areas of potential growth within this rapidly evolving area of research. Impact statement Machine learning (ML) has accelerated scientific discovery and augmented clinical practice across multiple fields. Now, ML has driven exciting new paradigms in tissue engineering research, including machine-optimized biomaterial design, predictive modeling of scaffold fabrication, and spatiotemporal analysis of cell and tissue systems. The emergence of ML in tissue engineering, while relatively recent, has already enabled increasingly complex analyses of the relationships between biological, chemical, and physical factors in driving tissue regenerative outcomes. This review highlights the novel methodologies, emerging strategies, and areas of potential growth within this rapidly evolving area of research.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceTissue EngineeringBiocompatible MaterialsMachine LearningBiocompatible Materialsbioinformaticsbiomaterialsdeep learningmachine learningtissue engineering

Identifiers

PMID35943870
PMCPMC9885550

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.